stickerdaniel_linkedin-mcp-server: Skill for Claude Code

Triage PR Review Comments

Fetch all review comments on the current PR, verify each finding against real code, fix valid issues, and push.

Phase 1: Gather Comments

1. Determine the PR number:

   • Use $ARGUMENTS if provided
   • Otherwise: gh pr view --json number --jq .number

2. Fetch ALL comments (reviewers post in multiple places):

   gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews
   gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments
   gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr}/comments
   

3. Extract unique findings — deduplicate across Copilot, Greptile, and human reviewers. Group by file and line.

Phase 2: Verify Each Finding

For EVERY finding, verify against real code before accepting or rejecting:

1. Read the actual code at the referenced file:line
2. Check if the issue still exists — it may already be fixed in a later commit
3. Verify correctness using:
   • Code analysis (read surrounding context, trace call paths)
   • Run btca resources to see what's available, then btca ask -r <resource> -q "..." for library/framework questions
   • Web search for API behavior, language semantics, or CVEs
4. Classify each finding:
   • Valid — real bug, real gap, or real improvement needed
   • False positive — reviewer misread the code, outdated reference, or style preference

Phase 3: Fix & Ship

1. Fix all Valid findings
2. Run the project's lint/test commands (check CLAUDE.md for exact commands)
   • If lint/tests fail, fix the failures before committing
   • If a failure cannot be fixed automatically, skip that fix and report it as Valid (unfixed) in the Phase 4 table
3. git add only changed files, git commit with message:

   fix: Address PR review feedback
   
   - <one-line summary per fix>
   

4. Push: gt submit (or git push if not using Graphite)

Phase 3.5: Reply on each thread, then resolve it

Pushing the fix isn't enough. Each inline review comment lives in its own thread that GitHub keeps showing as "Unresolved" until someone explicitly resolves it. The skill must close that loop for every Valid and False-positive finding so the PR view actually reflects what was triaged.