Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bartoszarendt/agenticloop/change-request-gatenpx skills add bartoszarendt/agenticloop --skill change-request-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bartoszarendt/agenticloopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bartoszarendt/agenticloop/change-request-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bartoszarendt/agenticloop/change-request-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bartoszarendt/agenticloop/change-request-gate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00802 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00401 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
change-request-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Change-request gate
A change-request task cannot go straight to implementation. In files-backed task records this is
typically type: change-request; in GitHub-backed task records it is typically the
type:change-request label. It changes a locked decision, so the decision must be reviewed as
documentation before code follows it.
Gate
- The maintainer drafts or updates the affected durable docs. Use [[decision-capture]] when the decision should be tracked under
.agenticloop/decisions/. Use an ADR only when the decision earns one. - The docs-only change is reviewed by a human.
- A human marks the task approved in the active backend.
- Implementation proceeds through [[task-record-contract]] and [[review-and-accept]].
Until approval is present, hold the task in [[blocked-state]] with category contract.
Backend projections
Neutral rule
- Classify the task record as a change request before implementation starts.
- Hold the task in blocked or contract state until human approval is durably recorded.
- Human-authored work enters the loop only after the task record is clearly marked ready for the agent roles that will continue it.
GitHub projection
- Classify with the configured
type:change-requestlabel. - Record approval with the configured
approvedlabel. - Until approval exists, keep the task blocked under [[blocked-state]] with category
contract. - A human-authored issue enters the loop only when it carries
agent-readyand the configured grouping label when the project uses grouping.
Files projection
- Classify the task file with frontmatter such as
type: change-request. - Record approval with frontmatter such as
approved: trueafter the human approves the docs-only change. - Until approval exists, keep the task file in
status: blockedwithblock_category: contractand explain the hold under## Commentsor a blocker section. - A human-authored task file enters the loop only when it is no longer draft, the scope is
complete, and
status: agent-readyis set. If it is a change request, the approval gate still applies before implementation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 83 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 54a819506a28
change-request-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository bartoszarendt/agenticloop (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 802 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
consulting-analysis
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This…
ppt-generation
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or make presentations (PPT/PPTX). Creates visually rich slides by generating images for each slide and composing them into a PowerPoint file.
deerflow-maintainer-orchestrator
Use when a DeerFlow maintainer needs comment-only GitHub issue or PR handling: resolve issue/PR scopes with gh, analyze issues, post or draft issue comments, perform PR review comments, review PR or issue batches, compare competing PRs that target the same issue, give fix strategy, risk classification, and validation…
systematic-literature-review
Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review…
academic-paper-review
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation.…