Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bayesimpact/bayes-platform. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/main/.claude/skills/end-feature/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bayesimpact/bayes-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/end-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/end-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/end-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/end-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bayesimpact/bayes-platform/end-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01305 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
end-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wrap up a feature by running its final steps. Present a checklist form, then execute only the checked steps, in the fixed order below.
Step 0 — Show the checklist form
Before doing anything, call AskUserQuestion with a single multi-select question so the user can check/uncheck the steps (list them as the options; the user unchecks any they want to skip):
- Update changelog — add an entry under
## [Unreleased]inCHANGELOG.md - Create a branch — move current work onto a feature branch
- Review the frontend conventions — a subagent reviews the diff of an ADR 0031 app against
docs/frontend/conventions.md - Run tests-parallel —
make tests-parallel - Create a PR — open a pull request with
gh
All steps are pre-selected by default EXCEPT the changelog, which is optional: pre-select it only when the change is visible to end users or security-relevant. Leave it unchecked for internal work — refactors, CI/tooling, docs, tests. Mention in the question why you left it unchecked; the user can still check it. Pre-select the frontend review only when the diff touches apps/desk, packages/desk-contracts or docs/frontend/.
Use header: "Steps", multiSelect: true. Whatever the user leaves checked is the set to run.
Then run the checked steps strictly in this order (skip unchecked ones):
1. Update changelog
Only if checked. Edit CHANGELOG.md, adding a line under ## [Unreleased]:
- New capability →
### Added; modified behavior →### Changed; bug fix →### Fixed; security hardening or vulnerability fix →### Security. - Write for end users, not developers — describe the visible outcome, not entities/services/migrations.
- Prefix with
(beta)if the feature is behind a flag or not yet exposed in the UI. - Write in STE (Simplified Technical English): short sentences (max 20 words), one fact per sentence, active voice.
- One sentence per entry. Even a large feature gets one headline sentence naming the capability or the new status (e.g. "Agents now have a draft and a published version of their settings."), not the mechanics. No sub-bullets. Never chain clauses with ";", "—", or "so".
- Name the capability, not the UI: no button placement, labels, colors, or click behavior. Keep dates and required user actions.
- Merge entries that belong to the same change into one. Delete an entry whose information is already carried by another.
- Verify before writing: check the actual commits/code for how a change works (runtime vs data migration, full vs partial scope). Scope claims exactly — write "New CSV extraction runs are personal." when existing data is unaffected.
- Do not add an entry for a bug that was never in a released version. Check that the bug's cause was in the last release tag before listing a fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +9 lines · +5 tokens per session b6bbd4d08d3b
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 444a882ca0d1
end-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository bayesimpact/bayes-platform (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
end-feature compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| end-featurebayesimpact/bayes-platform | Skill | 23 | yesterday | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| merge-batchdiegosouzapw/OmniRoute | Skill | 83k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| prowler-commitprowler-cloud/prowler | Skill | 15k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gh-auth-isolationgithub/gh-aw | Skill | 5.6k | yesterday | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| github-skillzeenie-ai/OpenCompany | Skill | 1.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| comet-githubrpamis/comet | Skill | 3.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code, Codex |
| release-helperSahir619/fable-method | Skill | 2.3k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |