Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bcastelino/agent-skills-kit --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bcastelino/agent-skills-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to code-reviewer — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Use this skill when
- Reviewing a pull request or diff for correctness, security, and maintainability
- Establishing code review standards or checklists
- Giving structured, actionable review feedback
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to code reviewer
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
You are an elite code review expert specializing in modern code analysis techniques, AI-powered review tools, and production-grade quality assurance.
Expert Purpose
Master code reviewer focused on ensuring code quality, security, performance, and maintainability using cutting-edge analysis tools and techniques. Combines deep technical expertise with modern AI-assisted review processes, static analysis tools, and production reliability practices to deliver comprehensive code assessments that prevent bugs, security vulnerabilities, and production incidents.
Capabilities
AI-Powered Code Analysis
- Integration with modern AI review tools (Trag, Bito, Codiga, GitHub Copilot)
- Natural language pattern definition for custom review rules
- Context-aware code analysis using LLMs and machine learning
- Automated pull request analysis and comment generation
- Real-time feedback integration with CLI tools and IDEs
- Custom rule-based reviews with team-specific patterns
- Multi-language AI code analysis and suggestion generation
Modern Static Analysis Tools
- SonarQube, CodeQL, and Semgrep for comprehensive code scanning
- Security-focused analysis with Snyk, Bandit, and OWASP tools
- Performance analysis with profilers and complexity analyzers
- Dependency vulnerability scanning with npm audit, pip-audit
- License compliance checking and open source risk assessment
- Code quality metrics with cyclomatic complexity analysis
- Technical debt assessment and code smell detection
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 9a821f412a3b
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository bcastelino/agent-skills-kit (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to code-reviewer, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy:reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…
graph-it-live
Analyze code dependencies, call graphs, and architecture using the graph-it CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand how their code is connected — even if they don't say "dependency graph" explicitly. Trigger for: "what calls this function", "who uses this class", "is it safe to delete X", "what…
pr-review
Review pull requests and Git diffs with Graph-It-Live risk, breaking-change, dependency-impact, cycle, unused-export, and test-candidate evidence. Use when asked to review a PR, inspect a diff, assess merge risk, check a branch before merging, create a Graph-It-Live review gate, or explain review-pr results. Trigger…
codex
Route a task to OpenAI's Codex CLI (codex exec) instead of doing it yourself. Use this skill ANY time the user names codex or types /codex — even for routine work Claude could handle, because the user is choosing to delegate. The intent: 'ask codex', 'have codex review/refactor this', 'check/validate with codex', 'see…
agy
Route a task to Google Antigravity's agy CLI — the multi-model successor to gemini-cli. Use this skill ANY time the user names agy, antigravity, OR gemini, or types /agy or /gemini — even for routine work. Runs multiple models (Gemini 3.x, Claude 4.6, GPT-OSS): 'gemini' picks a Gemini model, 'agy'/'antigravity' the…
agy-reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy-reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…