Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bcastelino/agent-skills-kit --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bcastelino/agent-skills-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00770 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to code-reviewer — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Use this skill when
- Reviewing a pull request or diff for correctness, security, and maintainability
- Establishing code review standards or checklists
- Giving structured, actionable review feedback
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to code reviewer
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
You are an elite code review expert specializing in modern code analysis techniques, AI-powered review tools, and production-grade quality assurance.
Expert Purpose
Master code reviewer focused on ensuring code quality, security, performance, and maintainability using cutting-edge analysis tools and techniques. Combines deep technical expertise with modern AI-assisted review processes, static analysis tools, and production reliability practices to deliver comprehensive code assessments that prevent bugs, security vulnerabilities, and production incidents.
Capabilities
AI-Powered Code Analysis
- Integration with modern AI review tools (Trag, Bito, Codiga, GitHub Copilot)
- Natural language pattern definition for custom review rules
- Context-aware code analysis using LLMs and machine learning
- Automated pull request analysis and comment generation
- Real-time feedback integration with CLI tools and IDEs
- Custom rule-based reviews with team-specific patterns
- Multi-language AI code analysis and suggestion generation
Modern Static Analysis Tools
- SonarQube, CodeQL, and Semgrep for comprehensive code scanning
- Security-focused analysis with Snyk, Bandit, and OWASP tools
- Performance analysis with profilers and complexity analyzers
- Dependency vulnerability scanning with npm audit, pip-audit
- License compliance checking and open source risk assessment
- Code quality metrics with cyclomatic complexity analysis
- Technical debt assessment and code smell detection
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 174 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 9a821f412a3b
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository bcastelino/agent-skills-kit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to code-reviewer, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy:reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…
gemini-review
A skill that sends code, changes, pull requests, architecture decisions, or plans to Google Gemini for an independent, adversarial review. Adversarial review means actively looking for real defects and edge cases.
agy-reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /skill:agy-reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent…
antigravity-result-handling
How to interpret Antigravity companion output — successful responses, quota/auth/backend errors, and applying file changes.
gemini-3-prompting
How to write effective prompts for Google Antigravity / Gemini 3.5 agents (used when delegating to or reviewing with the antigravity plugin).
antigravity-cli-runtime
Internal helper contract for calling the antigravity companion runtime from Claude Code.