Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bcastelino/agent-skills-kit --skill vulnerability-scannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bcastelino/agent-skills-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/vulnerability-scanner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/vulnerability-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/vulnerability-scanner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/vulnerability-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bcastelino/agent-skills-kit/vulnerability-scanner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01848 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00924 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
vulnerability-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to vulnerability-scanner — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vulnerability Scanner
Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.
🔧 Runtime Scripts
Execute for automated validation:
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/security_scan.py |
Validate security principles applied | python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path> |
📋 Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| checklists.md | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |
1. Security Expert Mindset
Core Principles
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside |
| Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify |
| Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point |
| Least Privilege | Minimum required access only |
| Fail Secure | On error, deny access |
Threat Modeling Questions
Before scanning, ask:
- What are we protecting? (Assets)
- Who would attack? (Threat actors)
- How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
- What's the impact? (Business risk)
2. OWASP Top 10:2025
Risk Categories
| Rank | Category | Think About |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services |
| A03 | Software Supply Chain 🆕 | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
| A05 | Injection | User input → system commands |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture |
| A07 | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions 🆕 | Error handling, fail-open states |
2025 Key Changes
2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 276 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A def3f680a7dc
vulnerability-scanner is a skill published in the GitHub repository bcastelino/agent-skills-kit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,848 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to vulnerability-scanner, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
jobs
Manage agy staffer background jobs - collect results, check status, cancel, follow-up conversation, and setup. Use when an agy job needs collecting, when the user asks "is the agy job done", "show agy's result", "cancel the agy job", "continue the agy conversation", or "set up agy". This is the orchestrator's skill…
implementer
Delegate a coding task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini), which edits the working tree directly and can perform explicitly requested Git delivery. Use when the user says /agy:implementer, "have agy fix/build X", or wants to hand a well-scoped coding task to the agy staffer instead of doing it in…
researcher
Delegate a deep research or survey task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini). Use when the user says /agy:researcher, "ask agy to research", "have the agy staffer survey X", or wants a second, independent deep-dive on a topic or codebase without spending the host model's quota.
staffer
Delegate a general-purpose task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) with a minimal, unopinionated prompt. Use when the user says /agy:staffer, "have agy do/handle X", "have agy generate an image", or the task fits none of the specialist personas (researcher / reviewer / implementer / ask) — the…
agy-researcher
Delegate a deep research or survey task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini). Use when the user says /skill:agy-researcher, "ask agy to research", "have the agy staffer survey X", or wants a second, independent deep-dive on a topic or codebase without spending the host model's quota.
agy-staffer
Delegate a general-purpose task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) with a minimal, unopinionated prompt. Use when the user says /skill:agy-staffer, "have agy do/handle X", "have agy generate an image", or the task fits none of the specialist personas (researcher / reviewer / implementer / ask) …