Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bdfinst/agentic-dev-team --skill compliance-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/compliance-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/compliance-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/compliance-mapping.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01985 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Mapping (pattern-first)
Purpose
Map unified findings to regulatory control citations so executive-audience reports can name the specific regulations at risk. Designed to be deterministic first — a pattern table handles the bulk; LLM judgment is invoked ONLY for cases the table flags as ambiguous.
This is explicitly informational, not audit-grade. No report produced by this pipeline substitutes for a certified auditor's opinion. The disclaimer is mandatory and exact-wording.
Inputs
- Disposition register (post-fp-reduction unified findings with verdicts)
knowledge/compliance-patterns.yaml(this plugin) — the pattern table- Optional: target organization's pre-declared control scope (which regulations apply)
Output
A compliance-annotations.json file per the following shape:
{
"schema_version": "1.0",
"generated_at": "2026-04-21T10:00:00Z",
"disclaimer": "<verbatim text from knowledge/disclaimers.md § Compliance mapping disclaimer>",
"annotations": [
{
"finding_rule_id": "semgrep.python.hardcoded-password",
"finding_file": "config/prod.py",
"finding_line": 42,
"regulations": [
{"regulation": "PCI-DSS", "control_id": "3.2.1", "citation": "PCI-DSS v4.0 §3.2.1"},
{"regulation": "GDPR", "control_id": "Art. 32", "citation": "GDPR Article 32 — Security of Processing"}
],
"annotator": "pattern-table" // or "llm" if llm_review_trigger fired
}
]
}
Pattern table schema (knowledge/compliance-patterns.yaml)
Each row maps a finding pattern to one or more regulatory citations.
# plugins/security-assessment/knowledge/compliance-patterns.yaml
patterns:
- id: pan-at-log
pattern_regex: 'log\.(debug|info).*(pan|card_number|primary_account)'
field_type: "pii.pan"
applies_to_rules:
- "semgrep.*.pii-log"
- "business-logic.fraud.tokenization-skip-under-flag"
regulations:
- regulation: "PCI-DSS"
control_id: "3.4"
citation: "PCI-DSS v4.0 §3.4 — PAN must be rendered unreadable in storage and in logs"
- regulation: "PCI-DSS"
control_id: "10.2"
citation: "PCI-DSS v4.0 §10.2 — Audit logs must not contain sensitive authentication data"
llm_review_trigger: false
- id: unencrypted-db-transit
pattern_regex: "(mongodb|postgres|mysql)://[^@]+@[^/]+/[^?]+($|(?!.*ssl|.*tls))"
field_type: "db.transit"
applies_to_rules:
- "semgrep.*.unencrypted-database-connection"
- "trivy.iac.*"
regulations:
- regulation: "PCI-DSS"
control_id: "4.1"
citation: "PCI-DSS v4.0 §4.1 — Strong cryptography and security protocols on open public networks"
- regulation: "GDPR"
control_id: "Art. 32"
citation: "GDPR Article 32 — Security of Processing"
llm_review_trigger: false
- id: auth-bypass-admin
pattern_regex: ".*admin.*"
field_type: "auth.missing"
applies_to_rules:
- "semgrep.*.missing-csrf"
- "semgrep.*.unauthenticated-endpoint"
- "business-logic.fraud.*"
regulations:
- regulation: "PCI-DSS"
control_id: "8.3"
citation: "PCI-DSS v4.0 §8.3 — Multi-factor authentication for admin access"
- regulation: "SOC2"
control_id: "CC6.1"
citation: "SOC2 Trust Services Criteria CC6.1 — Logical access controls"
llm_review_trigger: true # rules in this class often need case-specific judgment
- id: insecure-random
pattern_regex: ".*"
field_type: "crypto.random"
applies_to_rules:
- "semgrep.*.insecure-random"
regulations:
- regulation: "PCI-DSS"
control_id: "3.6.1"
citation: "PCI-DSS v4.0 §3.6.1 — Cryptographic key generation practices"
llm_review_trigger: false
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 182 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A a6bc787d9e8d
compliance-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (280 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,985 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…