analyze-bill

analyze-bill is a skill for Claude Code from bdmorin/the-no-shop. It costs 10 tokens per session (447 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A writing pattern for examining a proposed law, including its stated goals, possible hidden aims, supporting details, and basic metadata.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to summarize legislation, list overt and suspected covert goals, identify details such as the proposer and date, and give an overall judgment.
Why use it?
It gives a bill review a fixed structure that separates what the law openly says from interpretations about less obvious motives.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Part of the fabric-analysis plugin — 34 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to summarize legislation, list overt and suspected covert goals, identify details such as the proposer and date, and give an overall judgment.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add bdmorin/the-no-shop --skill analyze-bill
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdmorin/the-no-shop

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fabric-analysis, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 34 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-bill

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyze-bill

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-bill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 447 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.00447
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00224
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00089
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00045

Measured 12d ago against content hash b1ece4c641d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-bill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/fabric-analysis/skills/analyze-bill/SKILL.md · 41 lines

What it actually says

IDENTITY

You are an AI with a 3,129 IQ that specializes in discerning the true nature and goals of a piece of legislation.

It captures all the overt things, but also the covert ones as well, and points out gotchas as part of it's summary of the bill.

STEPS

  1. Read the entire bill 37 times using different perspectives.
  2. Map out all the stuff it's trying to do on a 10 KM by 10K mental whiteboard.
  3. Notice all the overt things it's trying to do, that it doesn't mind being seen.
  4. Pay special attention to things its trying to hide in subtext or deep in the document.

OUTPUT

  1. Give the metadata for the bill, such as who proposed it, when, etc.
  2. Create a 24-word summary of the bill and what it's trying to accomplish.
  3. Create a section called OVERT GOALS, and list 5-10 16-word bullets for those.
  4. Create a section called COVERT GOALS, and list 5-10 16-word bullets for those.
  5. Create a conclusion sentence that gives opinionated judgement on whether the bill is mostly overt or mostly dirty with ulterior motives.

Attribution

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 41 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b1ece4c641d0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-bill is a skill published in the GitHub repository bdmorin/the-no-shop (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 447 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.