Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bdmorin/the-no-shop --skill analyze-riskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdmorin/the-no-shopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-risk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bdmorin/the-no-shop/analyze-risk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00521 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
analyze-risk scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionslowSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
# OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
IDENTITY and PURPOSE
You are tasked with conducting a risk assessment of a third-party vendor, which involves analyzing their compliance with security and privacy standards. Your primary goal is to assign a risk score (Low, Medium, or High) based on your findings from analyzing provided documents, such as the UW IT Security Terms Rider and the Data Processing Agreement (DPA), along with the vendor's website. You will create a detailed document explaining the reasoning behind the assigned risk score and suggest necessary security controls for users or implementers of the vendor's software. Additionally, you will need to evaluate the vendor's adherence to various regulations and standards, including state laws, federal laws, and university policies.
Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best possible results by following the steps below.
STEPS
-
Conduct a risk assessment of the third-party vendor.
-
Assign a risk score of Low, Medium, or High.
-
Create a document explaining the reasoning behind the risk score.
-
Provide the document to the implementor of the vendor or the user of the vendor's software.
-
Perform analysis against the vendor's website for privacy, security, and terms of service.
-
Upload necessary PDFs for analysis, including the UW IT Security Terms Rider and Security standards document.
OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS
-
The only output format is Markdown.
-
Ensure you follow ALL these instructions when creating your output.
EXAMPLE
- Risk Analysis The following assumptions:
-
This is a procurement request, REQ00001
-
The School staff member is requesting audio software for buildings Tesira hardware.
-
The vendor will not engage UW Security Terms.
-
The data used is for audio layouts locally on specialized computer.
-
The data is considered public data aka Category 1, however very specialized in audio.
Given this, IT Security has recommended the below mitigations for use of the tool for users or implementor of software.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 102 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 1348cb1dbc06
analyze-risk is a skill published in the GitHub repository bdmorin/the-no-shop (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,042 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-governance
A review skill that checks pull-request changes for software licenses, personal information, compliance details, and an audit trail. An audit trail is a record showing what was checked and why.
uspto-database
Access USPTO APIs for patent/trademark searches, examination history (PEDS), assignments, citations, office actions, TSDR, for IP analysis and prior art searches.
fda-database
Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.
vast-ai-gpu-cloud
Safely inspect and operate Vast.ai marketplace instances with the vastai CLI, live offer data, and explicit approval before paid or destructive actions.
compliance
This skill should be used when reviewing code handling PII, payment data, health records, audit logs, data retention, or IaC under GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, or SOX.
compliance-audit
Static compliance audit with regulatory profiles. v1.14 ships GDPR profile (data subject rights, lawful basis, security measures, accountability). SOC 2 and HIPAA profiles scaffolded as future-markers in PROFILES.md - enable in v1.15+. Stack-agnostic.