Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BechsteinDigital/claude-shiploop --skill autonomous-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BechsteinDigital/claude-shiploopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bechsteindigital/claude-shiploop/autonomous-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bechsteindigital/claude-shiploop/autonomous-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bechsteindigital/claude-shiploop/autonomous-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bechsteindigital/claude-shiploop/autonomous-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bechsteindigital/claude-shiploop/autonomous-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01906 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00762 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00381 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
autonomous-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autonomous Delivery Loop
Principle
The loop orchestrates roles as subagents and works without user input until the MVP gate,
an escalation criterion, or context pressure. The core contract in project/BRIEF.md is the
constitution; project/STATE.md the single state store.
Cycle (repeat)
- Sync: read
STATE.md; increment the cycle counter (basis for cooling-off) and check it against the cycle cap — cap reached → runaway stop (see stop conditions), no further cycle. Incorporate open merges, blockers, review results. - CEO tick (inline per
role-ceo): activate next WORK items up to the WIP limit, evaluate gates. No new reason → no reprioritization. - PO step (per
role-po): cut activated items into cards — with acceptance criteria, claim limits, and disjoint claim zones. Idea triage viaproject/IDEAS.md. - DEV fan-out (parallel): one DEV subagent per card, all in one invocation block. Embed context instead of having it read: the WORK card and profile extract (commands, quality rules) are verbatim in the prompt — the subagent only reads its role skill. Model choice by card complexity: S/M →
sonnet(very large diff or wide context →sonnet[1m]); L or "sensitive" →opus. These override the subagent's ownmodelfield (the role skills carryinheritprecisely so the spawn decides). The orchestrator verifies the rating before spawning: risk-regex hits in the claim zone, gate relevance, or security/concurrency aspects override a lower PO rating upward — never downward. Zones not safely disjoint or > 2 parallel DEVs → worktree isolation per agent. Parallel DEVs run only targeted tests of their zone plus a regression check of the foundation modules — the full suite run belongs to the orchestrator after the merge (otherwise everyone tests against half-finished neighbor zones). - Review pipeline (risk-based): as soon as a DEV finishes, start a reviewer subagent per
role-reviewer— don't wait for the slowest card. Full review (gate-relevant →opus, otherwisesonnet) for: production code, gate packages, risk-regex hits in the diff, or included status claims. Light review (haiku) for trivial packages (tests/docs only, small diff): zone check, acceptance check, targeted tests, compact claim audit — without pattern spot-check. - Fix loop: findings/
BLOCKED→ targeted fix run (same card, same zone). Max. 2 attempts per blocker, then the autonomy contract applies (escalation or DEFER with ADR). Findings in files outside all zones (no-man's-land, e.g. legacy or skeleton tests): never have the DEV fix them along the way — the PO immediately cuts a dedicated fix card with its own zone, which runs before the blocked packages merge. - Merge sequentially: merge one package after another — before each, the mechanical check per package,
executed on the package branch with a clean orchestrator tree (commit your own
project/changes such asSTATE.md/IDEAS.mdfirst, so only package changes land in the check):<skills-dir>/_shared/scripts/merge-check.sh <base> --zone <card-zone>… --allow project/backlog/<WORK-NNN>.md --allow project/PROFILE.md --test-cmd "<full test from PROFILE>"—<skills-dir>is the installation location of these skills (project-local.claude/skills/, global~/.claude/skills/, or the plugin root when installed via/plugin install). No broad--allow project/: that would wave through DEV changes toSTATE.md,BRIEF.md, orIDEAS.md. Allowed are only the package's own card (evidence) andPROFILE.md(command maintenance); for special cases the check knows--deny(overrides zone and allow).FAILblocks the merge hard (zone violation → finding + fix card; red suite → fix loop) — no discretion. The full suite runs exactly once per package: here, via the check — DEV and reviewer only test targeted, duplicate runs are cut. Card to DONE incl. evidence, updateSTATE.md. - Collect ideas: transfer
IDEAS/FOLLOW-UPfrom all DEV outputs toproject/IDEAS.md— record only; evaluation happens in the PO step of the next cycle (cooling-off). - Stop check (see below), otherwise next cycle.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 71092cbb4986
autonomous-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository BechsteinDigital/claude-shiploop (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,906 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
paperclip
Use for Paperclip-managed tasks and heartbeats: reading task context, delivering task documents or files, updating completion or blockers, coordinating or delegating work, and following company governance. Includes control plane API operations for assignments, comments, approvals, and routines.
paperclip
Interact with the Paperclip control plane API for task coordination and governance. Use when checking assignments, updating issue status, posting comments, delegating work, managing routines, or calling Paperclip API endpoints.
paperclip-board
Manage a Paperclip company as a board member via chat. Use when the user wants onboarding, company or agent management, approvals, task monitoring, cost oversight, or work product review in the Paperclip control plane.
paperclip-distill
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill. Turn source-bundled Paperclip activity into wiki-insightful project standups, durable project pages, decisions, and history without asset dereferencing.
summarize-status
Write a short, colloquial summary for a Paperclip summary slot: open with the 1–3 specific, concrete actions the reader needs to take right now to unblock the work, then a brief plain-language status, streaming progress as it works.
paperclip-task-bridge
Create, comment on, update, and list Paperclip tasks from Hermes using scoped Paperclip API credentials.