Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beel-collab/presets.dev --skill error-handling-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beel-collab/presets.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/error-handling-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/error-handling-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/error-handling-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
error-handling-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Error Handling Patterns
Build resilient applications with robust error handling strategies that gracefully handle failures and provide excellent debugging experiences.
Use this skill when
- Implementing error handling in new features
- Designing error-resilient APIs
- Debugging production issues
- Improving application reliability
- Creating better error messages for users and developers
- Implementing retry and circuit breaker patterns
- Handling async/concurrent errors
- Building fault-tolerant distributed systems
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to error handling patterns
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Resources
resources/implementation-playbook.mdfor detailed patterns and examples.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 45 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 8d7288f07b39
error-handling-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository beel-collab/presets.dev (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Applies a modified Fagan Inspection methodology to resolve persistent bugs and complex issues. Use when several fix or debugging attempts have already failed and a methodical root-cause analysis warranting a Fagan inspection is needed. For first-pass diagnosis of a reproducible bug or regression use…
reframe-voice
Write, rewrite, or review content in the evidence-led reframe voice style. Use when the user explicitly asks to write in "reframe voice" or "reframe style". Do NOT use for general writing tasks.
qa-to-issues
Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Use when user wants to report bugs in their own codebase and create Github issues conversationally.
diagnose-hard-problem
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard problems, diagnosing bugs and regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test.
error-handling-patterns
Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.
backend-implementation-review
Use when you need to review server-side implementation for correctness, maintainability, validation, and observability.