Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/llm-prompt-optimizernpx skills add beel-collab/presets.dev --skill llm-prompt-optimizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beel-collab/presets.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/llm-prompt-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/llm-prompt-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beel-collab/presets.dev/llm-prompt-optimizer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01456 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00728 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00291 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
llm-prompt-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to llm-prompt-optimizer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Prompt Optimizer
Overview
This skill transforms weak, vague, or inconsistent prompts into precision-engineered instructions that reliably produce high-quality outputs from any LLM (Claude, Gemini, GPT-4, Llama, etc.). It applies systematic prompt engineering frameworks — from zero-shot to few-shot, chain-of-thought, and structured output patterns.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when a prompt returns inconsistent, vague, or hallucinated results
- Use when you need structured/JSON output from an LLM reliably
- Use when designing system prompts for AI agents or chatbots
- Use when you want to reduce token usage without sacrificing quality
- Use when implementing chain-of-thought reasoning for complex tasks
- Use when prompts work on one model but fail on another
Step-by-Step Guide
1. Diagnose the Weak Prompt
Before optimizing, identify which problem pattern applies:
| Problem | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Too vague | Generic, unhelpful answers | Add role + context + constraints |
| No structure | Unformatted, hard-to-parse output | Specify output format explicitly |
| Hallucination | Confident wrong answers | Add "say I don't know if unsure" |
| Inconsistent | Different answers each run | Add few-shot examples |
| Too long | Verbose, padded responses | Add length constraints |
2. Apply the RSCIT Framework
Every optimized prompt should have:
- R — Role: Who is the AI in this interaction?
- S — Situation: What context does it need?
- C — Constraints: What are the rules and limits?
- I — Instructions: What exactly should it do?
- T — Template: What should the output look like?
Before (weak prompt):
Explain machine learning.
After (optimized prompt):
You are a senior ML engineer explaining concepts to a junior developer.
Context: The developer has 1 year of Python experience but no ML background.
Task: Explain supervised machine learning in simple terms.
Constraints:
- Use an analogy from everyday life
- Maximum 200 words
- No mathematical formulas
- End with one actionable next step
Format: Plain prose, no bullet points.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 189 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 94904282ccdc
llm-prompt-optimizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository beel-collab/presets.dev (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,456 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to llm-prompt-optimizer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-enhancer
Transform poor or overly simple prompts with expert-level framing. Use when the user explicitly asks to improve, refine, or rewrite a prompt, or wants help framing a request for another AI system. Do NOT use for authoring, reviewing, or migrating system prompts or skills targeting a specific Claude model…
llm-prompting-guide
Prompt format rules for generative video and music models. Use when writing or reviewing a prompt for MiniMax H3 (text/image/reference-to-video with native audio) or MiniMax Music 3 (song generation from caption plus lyrics), in ComfyUI or elsewhere. Do NOT use for chat-assistant prompts, or for generative models not…
deepeval
Use when discussing or working with DeepEval (the python AI evaluation framework).
ml-llm-wiki
Use when answering questions from this machine-learning knowledge base. Triggers: questions about transformers, attention cost and efficiency, and long-context scaling; 'what do we know about attention', 'check the ML wiki'. Read-only querying of compiled knowledge; to add, update, supersede, lint, audit, or critique…
metodo-3w1h
Dê a habilidade para agentes de IA de estruturar e otimizar prompts de imagens utilizando rigorosamente o método 3W1H (Who, What, Where, How) criado pelo Mário Lúcio. Utilize esta skill sempre que o usuário mencionar termos como 'gerar imagem', 'criar prompt de imagem', 'engenharia de prompt de imagem', 'fotorrealismo…
prompt-estruturado
Gera prompts a partir de uma estrutura modularizada com persona, contexto, tarefa, formato e regras.