cache-policy-comparison

cache-policy-comparison is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from benchflow-ai/skillsbench. It costs 102 tokens per session (1,272 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A guide for comparing cache eviction policies, which decide which stored entry to remove when a cache is full. It covers LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, and ARC for systems such as page caches, CDNs, and LLM KV caches.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to choose or implement an eviction policy and to build replay simulations that compare cache behavior under different workloads.
Why use it?
It explains the different meanings of recency and frequency and highlights implementation details that can change measured hit rates.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to choose or implement an eviction policy and to build replay simulations that compare cache behavior under different workloads.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison
About the project

SkillsBench is a benchmark for measuring how effectively AI agents use modular skills—folders containing instructions, scripts, and resources—to complete specialized tasks. It helps researchers and developers evaluate both skill quality and agent behavior, including tasks that require combining multiple skills. The catalogue’s skills and instructions are evaluated as part of this workflow.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench · 1,764 stars · on GitHub · skillsbench.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill cache-policy-comparison
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benchflow-ai/skillsbench

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cache-policy-comparison

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cache-policy-comparison

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/cache-policy-comparison.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 102 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,272 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00102 $0.01272
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.00636
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00254
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00127

Measured 9d ago against content hash 353a72157276, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cache-policy-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

tasks/llm-prefix-cache-replay/environment/skills/cache-policy-comparison/SKILL.md · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Overview

An eviction policy decides which resident entry a cache removes when a new entry is admitted beyond capacity. Four policies cover almost every replay-and-measure task:

Policy Data structure On hit On admit Eviction choice
LRU OrderedDict Move to tail Append at tail Pop head
LFU {key: freq} + insertion order freq[k] += 1 freq[k] = 1 Min freq, tiebreak by insertion order
FIFO OrderedDict Nothing Append at tail Pop head
S3FIFO Three FIFO queues + freq[k] freq[k] = min(freq+1, cap) Admit to small; ghost-hit admits to main Second-chance on main; small drains to main/ghost

Each has subtleties that trip naive implementations.

LRU

Use an OrderedDict where the tail is the most-recently-accessed key. On hit, move_to_end. On miss + insert, append; pop from head if over capacity.

Most common bug: forgetting to update recency on a hit. Without the refresh, LRU degenerates to FIFO — hit rate drops substantially on any workload with recency structure.

from collections import OrderedDict

class LRU:
    def __init__(self, capacity):
        self.capacity = capacity
        self._d = OrderedDict()

    def contains(self, k): return k in self._d

    def access(self, k):
        if k in self._d:
            self._d.move_to_end(k)
        else:
            self._d[k] = None
            if len(self._d) > self.capacity:
                self._d.popitem(last=False)

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 86 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 353a72157276

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cache-policy-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository benchflow-ai/skillsbench (1,764 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 1,272 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.