Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bendrucker/claude --skill bruhgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bendrucker/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/bruh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/bruh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/bruh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/bruh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/bruh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00235 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
bruh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Bruh
Say that again in plain language, like one person talking to another. $ARGUMENTS names what lost me, where I said.
Shorter is the point. Cut the claims that were carrying nothing, rather than restating all of them in smaller words.
Start with what the message was responding to and what changed. A message loses me on the setup it skipped as often as on its words.
Name the thing that does the work in place of the abstraction over it, expand an acronym on first use, and give the mechanism where a metaphor stood in for one. Reuse the names this conversation and this repository already use, since a fresh synonym for something already named is often what lost me.
Where I pointed at a file or a PR body, that is the target, and writing:no-diary is the skill for it.
Write the rest of the conversation in your normal register.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +1 lines 69893dbc40cf
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c30438b55c90
bruh is a skill published in the GitHub repository bendrucker/claude (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 235 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.
alive:system-upgrade
Upgrade ALIVE to the current version. Handles v1/v2/v3.x source states, multi-surface aware (alive-mcp / Hermes / Codex), retroactive version detection, partial-failure resume, dry-run previews, and rollback inspection.
pr-review
Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…
extract-resume
Parse a resume's uploaded PDF into structured JSON (basics, experience, projects, skills, education) and save it to the editor.
create-site
Creates a new Power Pages code site (SPA) from a curated template or from scratch using React, Angular, Vue, or Astro. Guides through the full process from initial concept to deployed site: requirements discovery, template selection or scaffolding, component planning, design, implementation, validation, and…
ensure-pipelines-host
Ensures the tenant has a usable Power Platform Pipelines host environment before any pipeline operation runs. Detects host state via the same resolution order as the Power Apps UI (org-db setting → BAP env metadata → default-custom-host setting); if any existing host (Platform or Custom) is found, uses it. If no host…