Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bendrucker/claude --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bendrucker/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00373 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
plan:review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Plan Review
Compare the implementation against the approved plan through a reviewer that sees only the plan and the diff. Relay where the implementation drifted and what follow-ups that warrants.
Fork the Review
The approved plan is the file under ~/.claude/plans/ whose path was injected into this session when plan mode exited. With no injected path, there is no approved plan: say so and stop.
Dispatch a background Agent: analyst when your agent types list it, otherwise general-purpose. Spawn a fresh agent rather than a fork. The reviewer starts without this session's context. Use a cheaper model when one is set. Hand it absolute paths to the plan file and to the rubric references/divergence.md, resolved against this skill's base directory. Tell it to:
- read the plan file.
- diff the implementation against the branch's base. The open PR's base is authoritative (
gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName). With no PR, use the repository default (gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name). A stacked branch targets its parent. Include uncommitted work:git diff <base>...HEAD, plusgit diff HEADandgit status --short. - return the report the rubric defines.
Report
Relay the agent's report verbatim: divergences with their classification, requirements drift, ranked follow-ups split fix-before-merge from later, and the verdict.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · -4 lines f48baa293deb
- 2mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A d1ab3932c278
plan:review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bendrucker/claude (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 373 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
plan:review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plan:reviewbendrucker/claude | Skill | 18 | today | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| reviewSethGammon/Citadel | Skill | 928 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| critical-code-reviewerposit-dev/skills | Skill | 561 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 67 | Claude Code |
| brooks-sweephyhmrright/brooks-lint | Skill | 1.6k | today | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| pr-reviewnitinjain999/platform-skills | Skill | 71 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| skill-distilleriliaal/whetstone | Skill | 36 | today | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| review-depthjszmajda/lid | Skill | 118 | today | MIT | A | 93 | Claude Code |