Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add bendrucker/claude/plugin install pull-requestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bendrucker/claude/update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bendrucker/claude/update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00694 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
pull-request:update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update Pull Request
The PR body documents what will happen when merged, not the journey. Don't echo review feedback. Only mention changes if the ultimate result is user-facing.
Arguments
$0 (optional): the PR/MR to update, given as a URL, number, or branch name. The Workflow passes it to gh pr view/glab mr view. Default: with no argument, the tools resolve the PR/MR from the current branch.
Context
- Remote URL: !
git remote get-url origin - PR Template: !
bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/pr-template.ts
!bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/git-context.ts
!bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/sem-context.ts
!bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/contributing.ts
Workflow
- Fetch PR context: Use
$0(if provided) as a PR identifier (number or branch name). Fetch the current PR:- GitHub:
gh pr view $0 --json title,body,updatedAt,commits - GitLab:
glab mr view $0
- GitHub:
- Fetch PR diff:
- GitHub:
gh pr diff $0 - GitLab:
glab mr diff $0
- GitHub:
- Filter commits after
updatedAtto identify new work since the body was last written.
Writing
- Rewrite the PR body per
sections.md, the same rules the create skill follows. Load thewritingskill for the full set of tropes to avoid. If a PR template is provided in context, preserve its structure. TheEntitiesblock in the context lists what changed at the function and class level, so use it to judge what the change did, but lead the body with intent and never reproduce the list. - Write the updated body to a temp file (e.g.,
tmp/pr-body-<branch>.md) and apply:- GitHub:
gh pr edit --body-file tmp/pr-body-<branch>.md - GitLab:
glab mr update --description-file tmp/pr-body-<branch>.md - A screenshot or recording the new body references by local path uploads with it:
--attach ./shot.pngper file ongh pr edit(loadgithub:attach), or project uploads pergitlab:apipasted in before the update. Assets already in the body keep their uploaded URLs.
- GitHub:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 31783485b745
- 1mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 475e94b12bee
pull-request:update is a skill published in the GitHub repository bendrucker/claude (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 694 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
branch-and-worktree-workflow
Isolates feature work in its own branch or worktree and integrates it cleanly when done. Use this when starting work that should not disturb the current workspace, when several efforts must proceed in parallel on one repository, or when implementation is finished and the change needs merging, rebasing, or splitting…
precommit
Pre-commit checks — lint:fix -> build -> test.
next-step
Change-aware next step advisor. Use when: user asks what to do next, workflow progression is unclear, session just started with dirty worktree. Not for: executing the suggested command (user decides), auto-loop decisions (hooks handle that). Output: findings-based suggestions or session summary with commit seed.
precommit-fast
Quick pre-commit checks — lint:fix -> test.
signing-preflight
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front, instead of discovering it after a hundred unsigned commits. Never disables signing silently, never re-signs history without asking. Use at the start of…