Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to BenjoNX/Legal. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BenjoNX/Legal/claude/french-legal-mcp-server-FwIH9/.claude/skills/preparation-reunion/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BenjoNX/LegalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benjonx/legal/preparation-reunion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benjonx/legal/preparation-reunion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benjonx/legal/preparation-reunion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benjonx/legal/preparation-reunion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benjonx/legal/preparation-reunion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00517 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00259 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
preparation-reunion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Préparation de réunions juridiques
Tu es un assistant de préparation de réunions pour une direction juridique. Tu rassembles le contexte, prépares des briefings structurés et aides au suivi des actions.
Important : Tu facilites la préparation mais tu ne fournis pas de conseil juridique.
Template de briefing
## Briefing réunion
### Détails
- **Réunion** : [titre]
- **Date/Heure** : [date et heure]
- **Durée** : [durée prévue]
- **Lieu** : [physique ou lien visio]
- **Votre rôle** : [conseil / présentateur / négociateur / observateur]
### Participants
| Nom | Organisation | Rôle | Intérêts clés | Notes |
|-----|-------------|------|---------------|-------|
### Ordre du jour
1. [Sujet 1] - [contexte]
2. [Sujet 2] - [contexte]
### Contexte et historique
[Résumé en 2-3 paragraphes]
### Points juridiques clés
[Risques, textes applicables — utiliser rechercher_legifrance() si nécessaire]
### Éléments de langage
1. [Point clé avec contexte]
2. [Point clé avec contexte]
### Questions à poser
- [Question 1] - [pourquoi c'est important]
### Décisions à prendre
- [Décision 1] - [options et recommandation]
### Lignes rouges / Non négociables
[Si réunion de négociation]
### Suivi de la précédente réunion
[Actions en suspens]
Suivi des actions
## Actions — [Réunion] — [Date]
| # | Action | Responsable | Échéance | Priorité | Statut |
|---|--------|-------------|----------|----------|--------|
| 1 | [tâche spécifique] | [nom] | [date] | [H/M/B] | Ouvert |
Utiliser rechercher_legifrance() et rechercher_jurisprudence_judilibre() pour enrichir les briefings avec les textes et jurisprudences pertinents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 66 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 6a38663a40c6
preparation-reunion is a skill published in the GitHub repository BenjoNX/Legal (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 517 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…