Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add benthamite/dotfiles --skill orchestrate-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benthamite/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benthamite/dotfiles/orchestrate-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benthamite/dotfiles/orchestrate-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benthamite/dotfiles/orchestrate-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benthamite/dotfiles/orchestrate-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benthamite/dotfiles/orchestrate-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.05442 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.02177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00544 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrate-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +2 lines 5693e01b3552
- 10d ago First seen · 504 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 9075f3b7a986
orchestrate-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository benthamite/dotfiles (12 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 5,442 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
drift-check
Pre-PR advisory check for deviations from the project spec. Read-only analysis.
git-review
Review code changes, pull requests, or merge requests for bugs, code quality, security, and maintainability. Use when asked to review a PR, MR, diff, or set of changes. Also handles GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs.
ralphex-plan-audit
Audit a ralphex/farm implementation plan (docs/plans/.md) for self-containment, task concreteness, and verification that can actually run in the task container, before running it through ralphex or queuing it on ralphex-farm. ralphex runs every task and review in a FRESH session that re-reads only the plan (plus the…
claudemd-audit
Audit CLAUDE.md files against best practices. Analyzes length, structure, anti-patterns, and generates improvement recommendations with concrete suggestions. Invoke when user says "audit claude.md", "check claude.md", "review claude.md", "improve claude.md".
revmux
Run a revmux multi-agent review in an agterm overlay and bring the report back into the session. Use for "revmux", "review this plan with revmux", "run revmux on", "revmux review", "audit this plan", "multi-agent review", "review with the panel". Creates the task round, writes the scope and goal the reviewers read…
deep-review
Multi-pass code review of branch changes against the default branch. Broad parallel sweep across quality, implementation, tests, simplification, and docs, with optional external (codex) second-opinion consultation. Reports findings only — does not modify code. Use when user asks for "deep review", "thorough review"…