Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices --skill cherry-pickgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices/cherry-pick)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices/cherry-pick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices/cherry-pick/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices/cherry-pick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices/cherry-pick.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00191 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
cherry-pick scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cherry-pick Commit
Looking for: $ARGUMENTS
- Search for the commit:
git log --all --oneline | grep -i "$ARGUMENTS" | head -10
-
Show the matching commits and ask which one to cherry-pick (if multiple).
-
Show the diff of the selected commit:
git show <hash> --stat
- Confirm with user, then:
git cherry-pick <hash>
-
If conflicts arise, list them and ask how to proceed.
-
Report success: which commit was applied and what changed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 159490f63182
cherry-pick is a skill published in the GitHub repository berkcangumusisik/claude-code-practices (11 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
core-workflow
Detailed development workflow patterns, checklists, and standards. Auto-loads for complex tasks, planning, debugging, or when explicit patterns are needed. Contains session protocols, git conventions, security checklists, review-based validation, and communication standards.
shipit
Turn finished work into a clean commit and pull request. Always asks first whether the commit and PR should carry AI/bot authorship attribution or stay fully human-authored, then matches the repository's existing commit conventions, splits work into logical commits, and writes a PR body with context, risk, and…
commit
Create git commits with user approval and no Claude attribution.
commit
Smart commit with Ollama-generated messages. Conventional commits, auto-push option. Triggers on: commit this, commit changes, smart commit, /commit.
commit-push-pr
Commit current changes, push to remote, and create or update a pull request. Use when the user wants to commit and create a PR, push changes and open a pull request, or ship their current work as a PR.
app_tagline_backfill
Give apps built on this instance a share-card tagline when their app.yaml has none. Runs automatically once after Rome upgrades (AUTO mode, list supplied by the caller) or on request from the guardian ("add taglines to my apps", MANUAL mode, confirm before writing). Only touches editable mode: "source" apps — never…