besimple-broccoli-blind

besimple-broccoli-blind is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from besimple-oss/broccoli. It costs 58 tokens per session (2,370 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated coding workflow that sketches a plan, critiques it, implements it, simplifies the result, removes duplicates, and reviews the code. It is designed for non-interactive use and does not create pull requests or post Linear comments.

In plain words
What is it for?
Taking a repository change from an initial plan through implementation and code review, provided the required command-line tools and Git setup are available.
Why use it?
It combines several planning, implementation, cleanup, and review steps into one repeatable process without requiring choices at each stage.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; positional $N argument; mentions Codex.

Good fit Taking a repository change from an initial plan through implementation and code review, provided the required command-line tools and Git setup are available.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add besimple-oss/broccoli --skill besimple-broccoli-blind
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/besimple-oss/broccoli

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for besimple-broccoli-blind

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for besimple-broccoli-blind

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/besimple-oss/broccoli/besimple-broccoli-blind.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,370 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.02370
Opus 5 $0.00029 $0.01185
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00474
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00237

Measured 11d ago against content hash f4e5cd61ab13, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

besimple-broccoli-blind scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/prepare_plan_write_input.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

prompt-templates/skills/besimple-broccoli-blind/SKILL.md · 229 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Sketch -> Auto-select -> Plan -> Critique -> Implement -> Simplify -> Dedup -> Review (blind wrapper)

This is the automation-safe variant of besimple-broccoli.

  • It uses the same planning + implementation flow.
  • It automatically chooses recommended clarification options.
  • It does not open PRs and does not post Linear comments.

Preconditions

  • Confirm repo: git rev-parse --show-toplevel
  • Ensure CLIs: codex, claude
  • Ensure git commits are possible (user.name / user.email configured)

Required subskills

  • plan-sketch
  • plan-write
  • plan-critique-loop
  • implement-from-plan
  • claude-simplify-wrapper
  • dedup
  • code-review-loop

Workflow

  1. Prepare subagent logs and heartbeat

    LOG_DIR="/tmp/codex-subagent-logs/$(basename "$PWD")"
    HEARTBEAT_SECONDS=60
    SUBAGENT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS=7200
    mkdir -p "${LOG_DIR}"
    SKETCH_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/plan-sketch.log"
    WRITE_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/plan-write.log"
    CRITIQUE_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/plan-critique.log"
    SIMPLIFY_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/simplify.log"
    DEDUP_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/dedup.log"
    REVIEW_LOG="${LOG_DIR}/code-review.log"
    : > "${SKETCH_LOG}"
    : > "${WRITE_LOG}"
    : > "${CRITIQUE_LOG}"
    : > "${SIMPLIFY_LOG}"
    : > "${DEDUP_LOG}"
    : > "${REVIEW_LOG}"
    

    Resolve installed skill directories (so the wrapper works from any repo):

    resolve_skill_dir() {
      local name="$1"
      local repo_root=""
      repo_root="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)"
    
      local candidates=(
        "$repo_root/.agents/skills/$name"
        "$repo_root/.claude/skills/$name"
        "$HOME/.agents/skills/$name"
        "$HOME/.codex/skills/$name"
        "$HOME/.claude/skills/$name"
      )
    
      for d in "${candidates[@]}"; do
        if [[ -d "$d" ]]; then
          echo "$d"
          return 0
        fi
      done
    
      echo "Error: skill '$name' not found in repo-scoped or user-scoped skill dirs." >&2
      return 1
    }
    
    BESIMPLE_BROCCOLI_BLIND_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir besimple-broccoli-blind)"
    PLAN_SKETCH_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir plan-sketch)"
    PLAN_WRITE_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir plan-write)"
    PLAN_CRITIQUE_LOOP_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir plan-critique-loop)"
    SIMPLIFY_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir claude-simplify-wrapper)"
    DEDUP_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir dedup)"
    CODE_REVIEW_LOOP_SKILL_DIR="$(resolve_skill_dir code-review-loop)"
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 229 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 229 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A f4e5cd61ab13

Subscribe to this mod's changes

besimple-broccoli-blind is a skill published in the GitHub repository besimple-oss/broccoli (285 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,370 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adversarial-reviewer

Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes — before merging a PR, after a sprint, or when you suspect the review is being too agreeable. Forces perspective shifts through three hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer. Triggers on…

tmj-90/gaffer · 93 tokens

card-review

Internal skill for onboard's semantic review gate. After the deterministic validation gate (which catches invented symbols / hash drift / secrets), this skill drives a sampled claude -p pass that checks whether the TLDR and role are DIRECTIONALLY ACCURATE given the file's structure and head snippet. The deterministic…

tmj-90/gaffer · 125 tokens

review-ticket

Use as a reviewer agent to review another agent's inreview ticket — never your own. Judge whether each acceptance criterion is genuinely met and the change is sound, then record an ADVISORY verdict (per-AC evidence + an overall RECOMMEND APPROVE / RECOMMEND CHANGES line) via the scoped Dispatch MCP, leaving the ticket…

tmj-90/gaffer · 129 tokens

engineering-craft

Use on every code delivery to hold the structural-quality bar — reusability where repetition is real, clear boundaries, explicit error handling, focused units, honest names, and tests for real logic. Invoke whenever you implement a claimed ticket and want the change to read like production code the repo's maintainers…

tmj-90/gaffer · 120 tokens

self-review

Use after implementing a ticket and after its tests pass, but before submitting for review, to review your own diff as a skeptic would. Checks the finished git diff against every acceptance criterion (is each genuinely satisfied?), against scope (did you change only what the ticket needs?), and against quality (bugs…

tmj-90/gaffer · 110 tokens

api-design-reviewer

Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing REST API standards. Triggers on "API review", "REST design review", "breaking change check", "OpenAPI audit", "endpoint review", or "API consistency".

tmj-90/gaffer · 63 tokens