Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bestagentkits/agency-skills --skill boardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestagentkits/agency-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/board)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/board"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/board/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/board"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/board.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00593 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
board scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/hub:board — Message Board
Interface for the AgentHub message board. Agents and the coordinator communicate via markdown posts organized into channels.
Usage
/hub:board --list # List channels
/hub:board --read dispatch # Read dispatch channel
/hub:board --read results # Read results channel
/hub:board --post --channel progress --author coordinator --message "Starting eval"
What It Does
List Channels
python {skill_path}/scripts/board_manager.py --list
Output:
Board Channels:
dispatch 2 posts
progress 4 posts
results 3 posts
Read Channel
python {skill_path}/scripts/board_manager.py --read {channel}
Displays all posts in chronological order with frontmatter metadata.
Post Message
python {skill_path}/scripts/board_manager.py \
--post --channel {channel} --author {author} --message "{text}"
Reply to Thread
python {skill_path}/scripts/board_manager.py \
--thread {post-id} --message "{text}" --author {author}
Channels
| Channel | Purpose | Who Writes |
|---|---|---|
dispatch |
Task assignments | Coordinator |
progress |
Status updates | Agents |
results |
Final results + merge summary | Agents + Coordinator |
Post Format
All posts use YAML frontmatter:
---
author: agent-1
timestamp: 2026-03-17T14:35:10Z
channel: results
sequence: 1
parent: null
---
Message content here.
Example result post for a content task:
---
author: agent-2
timestamp: 2026-03-17T15:20:33Z
channel: results
sequence: 2
parent: null
---
## Result Summary
- **Approach**: Storytelling angle — open with customer pain point, build to solution
- **Word count**: 1520
- **Key sections**: Hook, Problem, Solution, Social Proof, CTA
- **Confidence**: High — follows proven AIDA framework
Board Rules
- Append-only — never edit or delete existing posts
- Unique filenames —
{seq:03d}-{author}-{timestamp}.md - Frontmatter required — every post has author, timestamp, channel
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 107 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 491127956042
board is a skill published in the GitHub repository bestagentkits/agency-skills (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 593 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
curate-collection
Build and maintain a library collection through acquisitions, weeding (deaccessioning), collection assessment, reader advisory, and interlibrary loan coordination. Covers selection criteria, collection development policies, the CREW/MUSTIE method for weeding, usage analysis, and responsive collection management. Use…
design-on-call-rotation
Design sustainable on-call rotations with balanced schedules, clear escalation policies, fatigue management, and handoff procedures. Minimize burnout while maintaining incident response coverage. Use when setting up on-call for the first time, scaling a team from 2-3 to 5+ engineers, addressing on-call burnout or…
design-training-program
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training…
conduct-retrospective
Conduct a project or sprint retrospective by gathering data from status reports and velocity metrics, structuring what went well and what needs improvement, and generating actionable improvement items with owners and due dates. Use at the end of a sprint, after a project phase or milestone, following a significant…
create-github-issues
Structured GitHub issue creation from review findings or task breakdowns. Groups related findings into logical issues, applies labels, and produces issues with standard templates including summary, findings, and acceptance criteria. Designed to consume output from review-codebase or similar review skills.
create-work-breakdown-structure
Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and WBS Dictionary from project charter deliverables. Covers hierarchical decomposition, WBS coding, effort estimation, dependency identification, and critical path candidates. Use after a project charter is approved, when planning a classic or waterfall project with defined…