Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bestagentkits/agency-skills --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestagentkits/agency-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01537 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00768 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-reviewer — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Reviewer
Automated code review tools for analyzing pull requests, detecting code quality issues, and generating review reports.
How This Skill Is Organized
code-reviewer/
SKILL.md ← you are here (tools + dispatch table)
rules/
universal.md ← security, async, resources, exceptions, performance — all languages
languages/
python.md ← Python-specific rules + idioms
typescript.md ← TypeScript / JavaScript-specific rules + idioms
go.md ← Go-specific rules + idioms
swift.md ← Swift-specific rules + idioms
kotlin.md ← Kotlin-specific rules + idioms
csharp.md ← C# / .NET-specific rules + idioms
java.md ← Java-specific rules + idioms
c.md ← C -specific rules + idioms
cpp.md ← C++ -specific rules + idioms
rust.md ← Rust -specific rules + idioms
ruby.md ← Ruby -specific rules + idioms
php.md ← PHP-specific rules + idioms
dart.md ← Dart / Flutter-specific rules + idioms
Loading order for every review
- This file (
SKILL.md) — tools and thresholds rules/universal.md— always, for every language- The matching
languages/*.md— one file based on the extension table below
That is always exactly 2 additional files, regardless of scope.
| Extension(s) | Load |
|---|---|
.py |
languages/python.md |
.ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx, .mjs |
languages/typescript.md |
.go |
languages/go.md |
.swift |
languages/swift.md |
.kt, .kts |
languages/kotlin.md |
.cs, .csx, .razor, .cshtml |
languages/csharp.md |
.java |
languages/java.md |
.c, .h |
languages/c.md |
.cpp, .cc, .cxx, .hpp, .hh, .hxx |
languages/cpp.md |
.rs |
languages/rust.md |
.rb, .rake, .gemspec, .ru |
languages/ruby.md |
.php, .phtml |
languages/php.md |
.dart |
languages/dart.md |
What ships with it
31 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 200 B
- assets/sample_c_clean.c 1.5 KB
- assets/sample_c_smells.c 1.5 KB
- assets/sample_csharp_clean.cs 3.6 KB
- assets/sample_csharp_smells.cs 2.7 KB
- assets/sample_java_clean.java 1.9 KB
- assets/sample_java_smells.java 2.0 KB
- expected_outputs/sample_c_clean_quality.json 1.3 KB
- expected_outputs/sample_c_smells_quality.json 4.1 KB
- expected_outputs/sample_csharp_clean_quality.json 2.8 KB
- expected_outputs/sample_csharp_smells_quality.json 3.6 KB
- expected_outputs/sample_java_clean_quality.json 999 B
- expected_outputs/sample_java_smells_quality.json 2.1 KB
- languages/c.md 4.5 KB
- languages/cpp.md 4.5 KB
- languages/csharp.md 3.9 KB
- languages/dart.md 4.9 KB
- languages/go.md 3.6 KB
- languages/java.md 4.3 KB
- languages/kotlin.md 3.4 KB
- languages/php.md 4.9 KB
- languages/python.md 3.3 KB
- languages/ruby.md 4.5 KB
- languages/rust.md 4.4 KB
- languages/swift.md 3.2 KB
- languages/typescript.md 3.8 KB
- README.md 4.8 KB
- rules/universal.md 2.1 KB
- scripts/code_quality_checker.py 36 KB runs code
- scripts/pr_analyzer.py 16 KB runs code
- scripts/review_report_generator.py 17 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 184 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A a21b527efc43
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository bestagentkits/agency-skills (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,537 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-reviewer, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
vanity-engineering-review
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review"…
argumentation
Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that…
cross-review-project
Conduct a structured cross-project code review between two Claude Code instances via the cross-review-mcp broker. Each agent reads its own codebase, reviews the peer's code, and engages in evidence-backed dialogue — with QSG scaling laws enforcing review quality through minimum bandwidth constraints and phase-gated…
create-pull-request
Create and manage pull requests using GitHub CLI. Covers branch preparation, writing PR titles and descriptions, creating PRs, handling review feedback, and merge/cleanup workflows. Use when proposing changes from a feature or fix branch for review, merging completed work into the main branch, requesting code review…
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".