Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestagentkits/agency-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/cro-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00812 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00406 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
cro-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/cs:cro-review — CRO Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:cro-review <plan>
The pipeline-paranoid operator pressure-tests revenue assumptions. Six questions that surface next-quarter pain this quarter.
When to Run
- Before committing to a quarterly revenue target
- Before changing sales motion (PLG ↔ sales-led, mid-market ↔ enterprise)
- Before hiring a batch of reps
- When pipeline coverage drops below 3x
- When NRR is trending down
The Six CRO Questions
1. Pipeline Coverage
What is pipeline coverage for the current quarter, by stage?
- Inbound-heavy: 3x. Outbound-heavy: 4x. Below either threshold = act now.
- Stage-weighted, not just total.
2. Win Rate Trajectory
What's win rate this quarter vs the last 4 — and what's the leak point?
- Stage-by-stage conversion.
- If a single stage softens, identify why before forecasting.
3. NRR Decomposition
What's gross retention, contraction, and expansion separately?
- NRR alone hides churn.
- A 110% NRR with 95% gross retention is different from 110% with 80%.
4. Ramp Time
For the last 4 hires, how many days to first deal and to quota?
- If ramp > 90 days at growth stage, hiring profile or enablement is broken.
- Forecasted hires must build in ramp.
5. Discount Discipline
What's the median discount this quarter vs last 4? Where is it creeping?
- Discount creep is the leading indicator of pricing or positioning weakness.
- Cap discounts by approver tier.
6. Pipeline Source Mix
What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced, sales-sourced, partner-sourced?
- If one source dominates > 80%, you have concentration risk.
- Cross-check with cs-cmo-advisor.
Workflow
python ../../../skills/cro-advisor/scripts/revenue_forecast_model.py
python ../../../skills/cro-advisor/scripts/churn_analyzer.py
Output Format
# CRO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Pipeline
- Coverage: X.Xx (target 3x+)
- Win rate: X% (4Q trend: ↑ / → / ↓)
- Top leaking stage: <name>
## Retention
- Gross retention: X%
- NRR: X%
- Expansion: X%
- Contraction: X%
## Ramp
- New hires last quarter: N
- Median days to first deal: X
- Median days to quota: X
## Discount
- Median discount this quarter: X%
- Trend vs 4Q ago: <delta>
## Source Mix
- Marketing: X% | Sales: X% | Partner: X%
## Verdict
🟢 ON PLAN | 🟡 GAP | 🔴 PIPELINE CRISIS
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 111 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A b85654d95814
cro-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bestagentkits/agency-skills (12 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 812 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
exposure-risk-quantification
FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR…
osint-methodology
Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 6-stage recon pipeline (seed → asset expansion → enrichment → exposure analysis → convergence → operator-armed active validation) with connector-resilience and stage-vs-gating discipline, asset-graph…
bencium-impact-designer
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Based on Anthropic's Frontend Designer Skill.
file-processing
Process and analyze CSV, JSON, and text files with data transformation, cleaning, analysis, and visualization capabilities.
design-audit
Premium UI/UX design audit and refinement skill. Conducts systematic visual audits of existing apps and produces phased, implementation-ready design plans. Use this skill whenever the user asks to audit a UI, improve an app's visual design, make an interface feel more polished or premium, review design consistency…
bencium-code-conventions
Bence's code style, tech stack, and workflow conventions.