Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bestdeejay-design/agent-skills --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestdeejay-design/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00159 | $0.01883 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00753 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review
Структурированный ревью PR/diff за один запуск: чек-лист, severity, файл:строка, исправление.
Загружай этот скилл когда нужно проверить код (diff, PR, commit) и получить структурированные замечания с приоритетами. Скилл читает изменения, применяет чек-лист из шести категорий и выдаёт готовый текст для комментария в PR.
🎯 When to use
Use this skill when:
- Нужно ревью PR/commit/diff перед мержем
- Просят «проверь код», «найди баги», «замечания по коду»
- Нужен чек-лист code quality перед релизом
- Нужно быстро прогнать diff по категориям: correctness, security, performance, style, tests, edge cases, a11y
- Нужен структурированный комментарий к PR с severity и ссылками на файл:строку
Do NOT use when:
- Нужно внести правки — скилл только анализирует и комментирует; исправления вносит агент отдельно по явному запросу
- Нужен полный аудит всего репозитория, а не изменений — скилл работает по diff
- Нужен security-аудит с PoC-доказательством уязвимости — используй специализированный security-скилл
- Это первичное ревью архитектуры без кода — скилл анализирует код, не схемы
📦 What this skill does
Inputs
--repo PATH— git-репозиторий: берётсяgit diff HEAD(staged + unstaged)--file PATH— обычный файл: ревьюится целиком, каждая строка считается добавленной--diff PATH— файл, содержащий git diff- stdin — git diff (по умолчанию,
git diff | review.py)
Outputs
- Список замечаний:
[severity] файл:строка — правило: проблема+ предлагаемое исправление - Сводка по категориям и severity (critical/warning/nit)
- Markdown-отчёт по шаблону
templates/review-template.md— готов для комментария в PR
🔧 How to use
Шаг 1: получить diff
git diff HEAD > /tmp/pr.diff
Шаг 2: запустить ревью
python3 scripts/review.py --diff /tmp/pr.diff
Или напрямую из репозитория:
python3 scripts/review.py --repo /path/to/repo
Или через stdin:
git diff | python3 scripts/review.py
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 3871171d49af
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 159 tokens per session scan A a3aac8e6a519
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bestdeejay-design/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 159 tokens to every session and 1,883 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
docs-decisions
Work on Composio documentation content, Fumadocs configuration, changelogs, docs automation prompts, docs decisions, ADR-style records, and docs review guidance. Use for files under docs/, documentation workflows, or requests to record or update a docs decision. Do not use for SDK runtime changes unless docs are the…
reflect
Use Recall Reflect to review AI coding workflow history as a conversation-first timeline and discuss observed patterns before changing behavior. Trigger when the user asks to reflect on a project, review AI coding workflow, inspect workflow friction, discuss repeated corrections, review handoffs, or explore possible…
atelier-orchestrator
Skill routing and workflow orchestration. Selects Inline Plan or Spec-backed Plan, routes to the correct workflow skill, and manages transitions between phases. Use when starting any conversation or task to determine which planning mode and skill apply.
atelier-setup
Configure a repository for Atelier's development workflow. Use only when explicitly invoked; inspect existing guidance, issue-tracker and domain-document conventions, preview the proposed configuration, and write only after approval. It does not install Atelier or initialize external tooling.
python-engineering-guidelines
General Python engineering standards for writing, reviewing, and refactoring maintainable code. Use when Codex works on Python code, especially in medium/large projects, runtime adapters, APIs, SDK integrations, async services, stateful systems, or refactors where readability, explicit typing, module boundaries, side…
dev-git-workflow
Use for non-trivial Git state such as branch strategy, worktrees, merge/rebase decisions, conflicts, reviewer-facing PR preparation, tags, and release notes. Do not trigger for a routine commit, push, or PR that needs no strategy decision.