Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill gapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/gap
- Cargar
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-para-abogados/gobernanza-ia/CLAUDE.md→ postura de gobernanza, registro de sistemas, políticas de IA. - Identificar el cambio regulatorio.
- Comparar contra la postura actual.
- Generar tabla de gaps con prioridad y acción.
/gobernanza-ia:gap
La Comisión ha publicado la primera tanda de estándares armonizados para
sistemas de IA de alto riesgo. ¿Estamos alineados?
Propósito
El Reglamento de IA se despliega progresivamente (2025-2027) y genera un flujo continuo de obligaciones nuevas: estándares armonizados, guías de aplicación, actos delegados, códigos de prácticas. Cada uno puede crear un gap entre lo que exige la norma y lo que hace la organización. Este skill detecta esos gaps antes de que se conviertan en incumplimientos.
Calendario de aplicación del Reglamento de IA
| Fecha | Obligaciones que entran en vigor |
|---|---|
| Febrero 2025 | Prohibiciones (art. 5); alfabetización en IA (art. 4) |
| Agosto 2025 | Modelos de propósito general (GPAI) — arts. 51-56; gobernanza — arts. 64-70 |
| Agosto 2026 | Sistemas de alto riesgo (Anexo III); obligaciones de deployers (art. 27) |
| Agosto 2027 | Sistemas de alto riesgo como componentes de seguridad (Anexo I) |
Proceso de análisis
Paso 1: Identificar el cambio
| Campo | Contenido |
|---|---|
| Fuente | [Reglamento de IA / Estándar armonizado / Guía Comisión / Autoridad nacional / Código de prácticas] |
| Referencia | [número, fecha, publicación] |
| Tipo de cambio | [Nueva obligación / Estándar técnico / Guía interpretativa / Acto delegado] |
| Fecha de aplicabilidad | [cuándo hay que cumplir] |
| A quién afecta | [Proveedor / Deployer / Distribuidor / Importador] |
Paso 2: Mapear contra la postura actual
Revisar contra los elementos del sistema de gobernanza de IA:
| Elemento de gobernanza | Estado actual | Nueva exigencia | ¿Gap? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inventario de sistemas de IA | [¿Existe? ¿Actualizado?] | [requisito] | |
| Clasificación de riesgo | [¿Se ha hecho para todos los sistemas?] | [requisito] | |
| Evaluaciones de impacto | [¿Realizadas?] | [requisito] | |
| Sistema de gestión de riesgos | [¿Implementado?] | [requisito] | |
| Documentación técnica | [¿Disponible?] | [requisito] | |
| Supervisión humana | [¿Definida?] | [requisito] | |
| Transparencia | [¿Cumplida?] | [requisito] | |
| Formación del personal | [¿Realizada?] | [requisito] | |
| Contratos con proveedores | [¿Revisados?] | [requisito] | |
| Registro en base de datos UE | [¿Completado?] | [requisito] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A ed7da52210da
gap is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (44 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-compliance
Creates, syncs, audits and manages Prowler compliance frameworks end-to-end. Covers the two supported JSON schemas (universal multi-provider and legacy per-provider), the SDK model tree (legacy attribute classes, universal ComplianceFramework, ConfigRequirements guardrails), output formatters (legacy per-framework +…
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…
open-weights
Use when choosing an open-weight LLM and clearing it for use — which family and size fit the task, the hardware and the budget, and above all whether the license permits shipping. Owns the license-class map (OSI-open versus custom-community versus non-commercial), the always-verify-the-model-card rule, size-to-VRAM…
813-regulations-iso-42001
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of…
801-regulations-eu-ai-act
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance…