Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill gapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/gap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00674 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/gap
- Cargar
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-para-abogados/gobernanza-ia/CLAUDE.md→ postura de gobernanza, registro de sistemas, políticas de IA. - Identificar el cambio regulatorio.
- Comparar contra la postura actual.
- Generar tabla de gaps con prioridad y acción.
/gobernanza-ia:gap
La Comisión ha publicado la primera tanda de estándares armonizados para
sistemas de IA de alto riesgo. ¿Estamos alineados?
Propósito
El Reglamento de IA se despliega progresivamente (2025-2027) y genera un flujo continuo de obligaciones nuevas: estándares armonizados, guías de aplicación, actos delegados, códigos de prácticas. Cada uno puede crear un gap entre lo que exige la norma y lo que hace la organización. Este skill detecta esos gaps antes de que se conviertan en incumplimientos.
Calendario de aplicación del Reglamento de IA
| Fecha | Obligaciones que entran en vigor |
|---|---|
| Febrero 2025 | Prohibiciones (art. 5); alfabetización en IA (art. 4) |
| Agosto 2025 | Modelos de propósito general (GPAI) — arts. 51-56; gobernanza — arts. 64-70 |
| Agosto 2026 | Sistemas de alto riesgo (Anexo III); obligaciones de deployers (art. 27) |
| Agosto 2027 | Sistemas de alto riesgo como componentes de seguridad (Anexo I) |
Proceso de análisis
Paso 1: Identificar el cambio
| Campo | Contenido |
|---|---|
| Fuente | [Reglamento de IA / Estándar armonizado / Guía Comisión / Autoridad nacional / Código de prácticas] |
| Referencia | [número, fecha, publicación] |
| Tipo de cambio | [Nueva obligación / Estándar técnico / Guía interpretativa / Acto delegado] |
| Fecha de aplicabilidad | [cuándo hay que cumplir] |
| A quién afecta | [Proveedor / Deployer / Distribuidor / Importador] |
Paso 2: Mapear contra la postura actual
Revisar contra los elementos del sistema de gobernanza de IA:
| Elemento de gobernanza | Estado actual | Nueva exigencia | ¿Gap? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inventario de sistemas de IA | [¿Existe? ¿Actualizado?] | [requisito] | |
| Clasificación de riesgo | [¿Se ha hecho para todos los sistemas?] | [requisito] | |
| Evaluaciones de impacto | [¿Realizadas?] | [requisito] | |
| Sistema de gestión de riesgos | [¿Implementado?] | [requisito] | |
| Documentación técnica | [¿Disponible?] | [requisito] | |
| Supervisión humana | [¿Definida?] | [requisito] | |
| Transparencia | [¿Cumplida?] | [requisito] | |
| Formación del personal | [¿Realizada?] | [requisito] | |
| Contratos con proveedores | [¿Revisados?] | [requisito] | |
| Registro en base de datos UE | [¿Completado?] | [requisito] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 141 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A ed7da52210da
gap is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-compliance
Creates, syncs, audits and manages Prowler compliance frameworks end-to-end. Covers the two supported JSON schemas (universal multi-provider and legacy per-provider), the SDK model tree (legacy attribute classes, universal ComplianceFramework, ConfigRequirements guardrails), output formatters (legacy per-framework +…
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
801-regulations-eu-ai-act
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance…
813-regulations-iso-42001
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of…
open-weights
Use when choosing an open-weight LLM and clearing it for use — which family and size fit the task, the hardware and the budget, and above all whether the license permits shipping. Owns the license-class map (OSI-open versus custom-community versus non-commercial), the always-verify-the-model-card rule, size-to-VRAM…
ai-policy-generator
AI governance policy creation for nonprofits and enterprises with frameworks, risk assessment, ethical guidelines, and compliance templates. Use when drafting AI usage policies, responsible AI frameworks, or organizational AI governance documents.