Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill iracgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/irac)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/irac"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/irac/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/irac"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/irac.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01580 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00790 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
irac scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/irac
- Leer
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-para-abogados/estudiante-derecho/CLAUDE.md— perfil del estudiante. - Recibir el análisis IRAC del estudiante.
- Evaluar con la rúbrica.
- Producir feedback.
Propósito
Evaluar el análisis de caso del estudiante con una rúbrica estructurada, proporcionando feedback específico que le ayude a mejorar. No reescribir — el objetivo es que el estudiante mejore su propio análisis.
REGLA CARDINAL
NUNCA reescribas el análisis. Señala qué falta, qué sobra, qué está mal argumentado y por qué. Pero la reescritura la hace el estudiante. Si reescribes, el estudiante no aprende a escribir.
Rúbrica de evaluación
I — Identificación del problema (25%)
| Criterio | 0-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulación como pregunta jurídica | No identifica el problema | Identifica vagamente | Identifica correctamente pero formulación imprecisa | Pregunta jurídica precisa y bien delimitada |
| Completitud | Ignora cuestiones relevantes | Identifica la principal | Identifica principal y alguna secundaria | Identifica todas las cuestiones relevantes |
| Priorización | Sin orden | Mezcla principal con secundarias | Ordena pero con errores | Prioriza correctamente por relevancia |
Puntuación I: [X] / 10 (peso: 25%)
R — Regulación aplicable (25%)
| Criterio | 0-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identificación de normas | Norma incorrecta o ausente | Norma correcta pero artículo vago | Artículos correctos | Artículos precisos + jurisprudencia relevante |
| Comprensión de la norma | Cita sin entender | Entiende parcialmente | Entiende la regla general | Entiende la regla, las excepciones y los matices |
| Jerarquía de fuentes | Ignora | Mezcla niveles | Correcta pero incompleta | Correcta y completa |
Puntuación R: [X] / 10 (peso: 25%)
A — Aplicación al caso (35%)
| Criterio | 0-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subsunción | No conecta hechos con norma | Conexión superficial | Subsunción correcta pero mecánica | Subsunción rigurosa y argumentada |
| Argumentación | Afirma sin argumentar | Argumenta parcialmente | Argumenta en una dirección | Argumenta en ambas direcciones |
| Hechos relevantes | Ignora hechos clave | Usa algunos hechos | Usa la mayoría | Identifica y usa todos los hechos relevantes |
| Contraargumentos | Ausentes | Menciona | Desarrolla parcialmente | Anticipa y rebate contraargumentos |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 134 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 497aaab6f00e
irac is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,580 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy-qa
Triage loop for inbound HR policy questions. Classifies each new question from the HR inbox as answerable from the documented Notion policy library or as needing HR's judgment, drafts a grounded Gmail reply for the former, and escalates the latter — anything ambiguous, legal, personal, or compensation-related — to…
patsnap-ip-innovation-courses
Patsnap IP & Innovation Courses MCP for AI agents. A one-stop learning entry for courses, course details, and training materials on IP and innovation. It helps teams build a structured understanding of patents, search, analysis, and business use while lowering the learning barrier for new users. It is useful for…
learn-law-with-rohas
Acts as an interactive legal tutor for learning a law, legal subject, doctrine, judgment, procedure, or legal concept. Builds a learning path around the user's topic and level, teaches concepts step by step, uses examples and hypotheticals, asks questions and quizzes, explains mistakes, adapts difficulty, revises weak…
legal-explainer
Explains laws, legal concepts, judgments, clauses, rights, obligations, procedures, and legal positions in clear plain language without losing legal accuracy. Use when a user asks "what does this mean?", "explain this law simply", "explain this clause", "what does this judgment actually say", "explain this to a…
grad-public-choice
Apply public choice theory to analyze political decision-making as rational self-interested behavior. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate government policy failures, rent-seeking costs, voting outcomes, or bureaucratic incentives, especially when the assumption of benevolent government is questionable.
creative-commons-explainer
Explains a specific Creative Commons licence in plain language, telling a media professional exactly what they can and cannot do with the licensed content — including attribution requirements, commercial use rules, and derivative work restrictions.