Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill ossgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/oss)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/oss"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/oss/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/oss"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/oss.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01073 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
revisor-licencias-oss scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Propósito
Esta skill analiza las licencias de software de código abierto (OSS) utilizadas en un proyecto y las clasifica según su nivel de copyleft. Detecta incompatibilidades con el modelo de distribución o explotación de la empresa y señala riesgos de cumplimiento.
Instrucciones
Paso 1 — Obtener inventario de dependencias
- Leer el listado de dependencias proporcionado (package.json, pom.xml, requirements.txt, SBOM, o listado manual).
- Identificar la licencia de cada componente.
- Si la licencia no está clara, marcarlo como "licencia desconocida" — riesgo por defecto ALTO.
Paso 2 — Clasificar licencias
| Categoría | Licencias | Riesgo de copyleft |
|---|---|---|
| Permisiva | MIT, BSD-2, BSD-3, Apache 2.0, ISC, Unlicense | Bajo — permite uso comercial y propietario |
| Copyleft débil | LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3.0, MPL-2.0, EPL-2.0 | Medio — copyleft limitado al componente |
| Copyleft fuerte | GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0, AGPL-3.0 | Alto — extiende copyleft a obra derivada |
| No libre / Propietaria | Licencias comerciales, SSPL, BUSL | Requiere análisis individual |
Paso 3 — Evaluar contra modelo de distribución
Modelos de distribución de la empresa:
- SaaS / cloud: AGPL es el riesgo principal (extiende copyleft a uso en red).
- Distribución binaria: GPL obliga a ofrecer código fuente.
- Biblioteca/SDK: LGPL permite linkado dinámico; GPL no.
- Uso interno: la mayoría de licencias OSS no imponen obligaciones sin distribución.
Paso 4 — Detectar incompatibilidades
- GPL-2.0 y Apache-2.0 son incompatibles (cláusula de patentes).
- GPL-2.0-only y GPL-3.0-only son incompatibles entre sí.
- Licencias con cláusula de atribución: verificar que se cumple.
- Licencias con restricción de uso (BUSL, Commons Clause): no son OSS.
Formato de salida
## Revisión de licencias OSS
**Proyecto:** [nombre]
**Modelo de distribución:** [SaaS/binaria/biblioteca/interno]
**Fecha del análisis:** [fecha]
**Dependencias analizadas:** [número]
### Resumen
| Categoría | Número | Porcentaje |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| Permisiva | [n] | [%] |
| Copyleft débil | [n] | [%] |
| Copyleft fuerte | [n] | [%] |
| Desconocida | [n] | [%] |
### Incompatibilidades detectadas
| Componente | Licencia | Problema | Severidad | Acción recomendada |
|------------|----------|----------|-----------|-------------------|
| [nombre] | [licencia] | [descripción] | [ALTA/MEDIA/BAJA] | [acción] |
### Inventario completo
| Componente | Versión | Licencia | Categoría | Compatible | Notas |
|------------|---------|----------|-----------|------------|-------|
| [nombre] | [ver] | [licencia] | [cat] | [SÍ/NO/?] | [nota] |
### Obligaciones de cumplimiento
[Lista de acciones necesarias: atribución, oferta de código fuente, etc.]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 97 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 31e602af7204
revisor-licencias-oss is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (43 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,073 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.