Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill portfoliogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/portfolio)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/portfolio"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/portfolio/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/portfolio"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/portfolio.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01246 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
portfolio-procesal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Propósito
Esta skill genera una vista consolidada (dashboard) del portfolio de asuntos procesales activos. Muestra la distribución de riesgo, próximos plazos, asuntos inactivos y resumen de costes. Diseñada para reuniones de seguimiento del departamento legal o comité de dirección.
Instrucciones
Paso 1 — Cargar registro de asuntos
- Leer el registro de asuntos proporcionado (fichas de intake, base de datos, listado).
- Filtrar asuntos activos (excluir archivados y cerrados).
- Verificar que cada asunto tiene los datos mínimos: referencia, cliente, jurisdicción, fase, riesgo, cuantía.
Paso 2 — Clasificar y agregar
Por jurisdicción:
- Civil, social, contencioso-administrativo, penal, mercantil.
Por posición:
- Demandante, demandado, preventivo/consulta.
Por fase:
- Preinicial, primera instancia, apelación, casación, ejecución.
Por riesgo:
- ALTO, MEDIO, BAJO (según última evaluación del briefing o del letrado).
Por actividad:
- Activo (última actuación < 30 días).
- Normal (30-90 días).
- Inactivo / stale (> 90 días sin actividad).
Paso 3 — Identificar alertas
- Asuntos con plazos en los próximos 15 días.
- Asuntos inactivos > 90 días (stale matters).
- Asuntos de riesgo ALTO sin briefing actualizado.
- Asuntos con coste acumulado superior al presupuesto.
- Asuntos sin abogado responsable asignado.
Paso 4 — Generar dashboard
Formato de salida
## Estado del portfolio procesal
**Fecha del informe:** [fecha]
**Asuntos activos:** [número]
**Cuantía total en riesgo:** [importe EUR]
---
### Resumen ejecutivo
[3-4 frases con los datos más relevantes del portfolio]
### Distribución por riesgo
| Riesgo | Asuntos | Cuantía en riesgo | % del total |
|--------|---------|-------------------|-------------|
| ALTO | [n] | [EUR] | [%] |
| MEDIO | [n] | [EUR] | [%] |
| BAJO | [n] | [EUR] | [%] |
### Distribución por jurisdicción
| Jurisdicción | Asuntos | Demandante | Demandado |
|-------------|---------|------------|-----------|
| Civil | [n] | [n] | [n] |
| Social | [n] | [n] | [n] |
| Contencioso | [n] | [n] | [n] |
| Penal | [n] | [n] | [n] |
| Mercantil | [n] | [n] | [n] |
### Próximos plazos (15 días)
| Asunto | Acción | Fecha límite | Responsable | Riesgo |
|--------|--------|--------------|-------------|--------|
| [ref] | [acción] | [fecha] | [nombre] | [nivel] |
### Asuntos inactivos (>90 días)
| Asunto | Última actividad | Días inactivo | Fase | Responsable |
|--------|------------------|---------------|------|-------------|
| [ref] | [fecha] | [n] | [fase] | [nombre] |
### Resumen económico
| Concepto | Importe |
|----------|---------|
| Cuantía total en riesgo (demandado) | [EUR] |
| Cuantía total reclamada (demandante) | [EUR] |
| Honorarios devengados (período) | [EUR] |
| Provisión para costas estimada | [EUR] |
| Presupuesto consumido vs. estimado | [%] |
### Top 5 asuntos por cuantía
| # | Asunto | Cuantía | Posición | Riesgo | Fase |
|---|--------|---------|----------|--------|------|
| 1 | [ref] | [EUR] | [pos] | [nivel] | [fase] |
### Alertas
| Tipo | Asunto | Detalle | Acción requerida |
|------|--------|---------|------------------|
| Plazo inminente | [ref] | [detalle] | [acción] |
| Stale matter | [ref] | [días] sin actividad | Revisar estado |
| Sin responsable | [ref] | [detalle] | Asignar abogado |
| Sobrecoste | [ref] | [% sobre presupuesto] | Revisar presupuesto |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago First seen · 136 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 8c32c844b865
portfolio-procesal is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (43 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,246 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.