Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill procedimientogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/procedimiento)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/procedimiento"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/procedimiento/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/procedimiento"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/procedimiento.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.02026 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00810 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00405 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
procedimiento scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/procedimiento
- Cargar
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-para-abogados/administrativo/CLAUDE.md→ sector, tipo de administración, historial. - Identificar la fase del procedimiento y el tipo de acto.
- Analizar plazos, opciones de recurso y silencio.
- Generar informe con árbol de decisión.
/administrativo:procedimiento
Hemos solicitado una licencia de actividad hace 4 meses y no hemos recibido
respuesta. ¿Qué podemos hacer?
Propósito
El procedimiento administrativo común (LPAC 39/2015) rige la relación del ciudadano y las empresas con la Administración. Los plazos son estrictos, el silencio administrativo tiene efectos jurídicos concretos y elegir mal el recurso puede cerrar vías. Este skill guía cada paso del procedimiento y ayuda a elegir la vía de impugnación correcta.
Fases del procedimiento administrativo
1. Iniciación (arts. 54-69 LPAC)
| Tipo | Características |
|---|---|
| De oficio (art. 58) | Por acuerdo del órgano competente, denuncia, petición de otro órgano |
| A solicitud del interesado (art. 66) | Modelo normalizado; subsanación de 10 días si incompleta (art. 68) |
2. Instrucción (arts. 75-85 LPAC)
Alegaciones, prueba, informes, audiencia al interesado (art. 82 — trámite de audiencia de 10-15 días).
3. Resolución (arts. 87-92 LPAC)
Plazo máximo para resolver y notificar: El que establezca la norma reguladora del procedimiento. Si no dice nada: 3 meses (art. 21.3 LPAC).
Obligación de resolver expresamente — art. 21.1 LPAC: la Administración está obligada a dictar resolución expresa y a notificarla en todos los procedimientos.
Silencio administrativo (arts. 24-25 LPAC)
Procedimientos iniciados a solicitud del interesado (art. 24)
| Regla | Efecto |
|---|---|
| Regla general | Silencio positivo — la solicitud se entiende estimada |
| Excepciones (silencio negativo) | Cuando una norma con rango de ley o derecho UE establezca lo contrario; transferencia de facultades sobre dominio público o servicio público; procedimientos de impugnación de actos y disposiciones; ejercicio del derecho de petición (art. 29 CE) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 200 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 4aa885e99e81
procedimiento is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (44 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 2,026 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…