Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add betobetico/claude-para-abogados --skill triajegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/triaje)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/triaje"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/triaje/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/triaje"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/triaje.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01810 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00905 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
triaje scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/triaje
- Cargar
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-para-abogados/gobernanza-ia/CLAUDE.md→ registro de sistemas IA, sectores, umbrales. - Recopilar información del caso de uso.
- Clasificar según el Reglamento de IA (Reglamento UE 2024/1689).
- Identificar obligaciones aplicables.
- Comprobar registro interno y emitir siguiente paso.
/gobernanza-ia:triaje
Queremos implementar un chatbot de atención al cliente con IA generativa
que responda consultas sobre productos financieros.
Propósito
El Reglamento de IA de la UE establece un sistema de clasificación por niveles de riesgo que determina las obligaciones aplicables a cada sistema de IA. Clasificar correctamente un caso de uso es el primer paso obligatorio antes de desplegarlo. Una clasificación errónea puede suponer desde incumplimientos administrativos hasta sanciones de hasta el 7% del volumen de negocio global.
Información necesaria
Antes de clasificar, recopilar:
- ¿Qué hace el sistema? (función concreta)
- ¿Qué decisiones toma o asiste? (autónomas / de apoyo)
- ¿Sobre quién impacta? (empleados, clientes, público general)
- ¿En qué sector se despliega? (financiero, sanitario, laboral, educativo, judicial...)
- ¿Quién es el proveedor? (propio / tercero)
- ¿Cuál es nuestro rol? (proveedor / deployer / distribuidor)
- ¿Se usa para perfilado, scoring, biometría o decisiones automatizadas?
Clasificación por niveles de riesgo
Nivel 1: Riesgo inaceptable (art. 5 RIA) — PROHIBIDO
Sistemas de IA cuyo uso está prohibido:
| Práctica prohibida | Art. 5 RIA |
|---|---|
| Técnicas subliminales, manipuladoras o engañosas que distorsionen el comportamiento | Art. 5.1.a |
| Explotación de vulnerabilidades (edad, discapacidad, situación social) | Art. 5.1.b |
| Scoring social por autoridades públicas con efectos perjudiciales desproporcionados | Art. 5.1.c |
| Evaluación de riesgo de delincuencia basada solo en perfilado o rasgos de personalidad | Art. 5.1.d |
| Creación o ampliación de BBDD de reconocimiento facial mediante scraping masivo | Art. 5.1.e |
| Inferencia de emociones en el lugar de trabajo o centros educativos (con excepciones) | Art. 5.1.f |
| Categorización biométrica para inferir datos sensibles (raza, opiniones políticas, orientación sexual...) | Art. 5.1.g |
| Identificación biométrica remota en tiempo real en espacios públicos por fuerzas de seguridad (con excepciones) | Art. 5.1.h |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 173 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A f3f0609955e8
triaje is a skill published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,810 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…