Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beyondeye/aitasks --skill aitask-contribution-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beyondeye/aitasksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beyondeye/aitasks/aitask-contribution-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beyondeye/aitasks/aitask-contribution-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beyondeye/aitasks/aitask-contribution-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beyondeye/aitasks/aitask-contribution-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beyondeye/aitasks/aitask-contribution-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00113 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00045 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
aitask-contribution-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6ab4e8fb8bbf
aitask-contribution-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository beyondeye/aitasks (8 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 113 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
quaere-audit
This skill should be used whenever the user asks for a serious security audit, vulnerability review, bug bounty triage, threat-model-driven code review, protocol/spec conformance audit, auth/authz or tenant-isolation review, exploitability analysis, CVE/advisory impact assessment, or security-sensitive PR review when…
quaere-prospect
A set of rules for finding worthwhile things to build next in a codebase or product. It requires a confirmed gap, an affected user, evidence of demand, and a small test before recommending work.
quaere-evidence
This skill should be used whenever the user asks to investigate unclear bugs, defend or reject PR review comments, triage CI failures or flaky tests, review risky/security/database/concurrency/external-API changes or multi-file refactors, or make any claim that needs evidence before patching. It enforces a falsifiable…
board-comment-style
Write board comments the way a colleague does — lead with the finding, a few lines, no preamble or process narration. Use when about to call addtaskcomment or commentonpullrequest, or when deciding whether something deserves a comment at all.
agentplane-task-closure-recovery
Use when Agentplane task completion, direct finish, branchpr integration, hosted-close, close-tail PRs, PR metadata, dirty task artifacts, or remote branch divergence need diagnosis or recovery.
beautify-with-pingfusi
Beautify or redesign an existing website through iterative pingfusi review rounds with a real human reviewer. Use when asked to "beautify this website," "make this page look professional," "polish this UI/design," "improve the visual design," or finish an AI-built page when there is no reference site to match. Do not…