Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bgauryy/octocode --skill octocode-graph-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bgauryy/octocodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bgauryy/octocode/octocode-graph-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bgauryy/octocode/octocode-graph-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bgauryy/octocode/octocode-graph-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bgauryy/octocode/octocode-graph-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bgauryy/octocode/octocode-graph-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01394 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00697 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
octocode-graph-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Octocode Graph Eval
Evaluate outcomes and run improvement loops with evidence, not vibes — for one loop or a graph of loops.
Flow: ERROR-ANALYZE → FRAME(goal→KPI) → BASELINE → LOOP → JUDGE → CAPTURE → VERIFY → SUITE-EVOLVE.
Modes: ErrorAnalyze · Define · Run · Suite · Benchmark · Audit.
Lobby rules
- No goal→KPI link → STOP. No measurable primary → STOP. No runnable sensor → build one before looping.
- Narrative-only accept → REJECT. Editing harness/cases/graders to pass → REJECT.
- ACCEPT only if primary moves on held-out and guardrails hold.
- Prefer deterministic graders; binary/LLM next; humans calibrate. Grade outcomes over paths.
- TDD for agents: write or select a failing case / KPI check before mutating the subject; green only after the change (red → green → keep|discard).
- Public benches orient; private failure suites gate ships. Distrust saturated/contaminated boards.
- Freeze the harness during an experiment; evolve the suite only between experiments.
- Graph check: before evaluating a multi-agent workflow, run edge detection — if no two nodes are independent (every step reads the prior step's output), it is a loop, not a graph. Build a loop.
- Goodhart guard: every primary KPI must have a counter-metric guardrail the agent cannot tune. Primary improving + guardrail degrading → reframe the goal, not the loop.
- Verifier independence: a verifier sharing the executor's context is not independent. Require fresh context before calling a result verified.
- Anchor requirement: every graph must have at least one node whose output cannot be argued with (tests that ran, build exit codes, type errors). No anchors → build one before trusting the graph.
Workflow
- Error-analyze traces into a failure taxonomy; frame success, primary/leading metrics, guardrails, and decision rule.
- Measure a fixed-budget baseline; make the smallest subject change; keep or discard from comparable results.
- Judge grader quality, fairness, capability versus regression, and contamination; capture one durable lesson.
- Verify held-out results and required checks; then add new failure cases between experiments. Stop when goal/KPI is undefined, checks did not run, the harness changed to pass, or another loop cannot change the verdict.
What ships with it
29 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/cases.json 25 KB
- evals/kpi-contract.json 1.1 KB
- evals/trigger-cases.json 1.1 KB
- README.md 3.1 KB
- references/agent-loop.md 1.6 KB
- references/benchmarking.md 1.5 KB
- references/error-analysis.md 1.4 KB
- references/eval-harness.md 1.9 KB
- references/eval-techniques.md 2.4 KB
- references/feedback-loops.md 1.7 KB
- references/goal-kpi-cascade.md 1.4 KB
- references/graph-failure-modes.md 2.1 KB
- references/graph-of-loops.md 3.1 KB
- references/held-out-and-guards.md 1.1 KB
- references/improve-loop.md 2.1 KB
- references/karpathy-patterns.md 2.9 KB
- references/kpi-contract.md 1.4 KB
- references/nested-loops.md 2.0 KB
- references/output.md 1.4 KB
- references/routing.md 1.1 KB
- references/subagent-approaches.md 2.3 KB
- references/subagent-communication.md 1.9 KB
- references/subagent-cookbook.md 1.5 KB
- references/subagent-kpis.md 1.8 KB
- references/subagent-protocol.md 1.8 KB
- references/trajectory-grading.md 3.1 KB
- scripts/check-description.mjs 1.1 KB runs code
- scripts/eval-eval.mjs 13 KB runs code
- scripts/loop-report.mjs 3.9 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 50 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 3ed19a1809eb
octocode-graph-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository bgauryy/octocode (932 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,394 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
component-creation
Step-by-step workflow for creating accessible, tested UI components. Use when the user asks to create a new UI component.
fix-tests
Systematic workflow for diagnosing and fixing failing tests. Use when the user reports failing tests or asks to fix test failures.
ci-cd
Workflow for creating a complete CI/CD pipeline. Use when the user needs to set up or modify CI/CD pipelines.
coverage-improvement
Systematic workflow for identifying coverage gaps and writing missing tests. Use when coverage is below target or the user asks to improve coverage.
debug-issue
Structured workflow for debugging a reported or reproduced issue. Use when the user asks to debug a bug, find root cause, or fix a failing scenario.
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.