Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bh-rat/context-awesome --skill find-awesome-toolsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bh-rat/context-awesomeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bh-rat/context-awesome/find-awesome-tools)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bh-rat/context-awesome/find-awesome-tools"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bh-rat/context-awesome/find-awesome-tools/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bh-rat/context-awesome/find-awesome-tools"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bh-rat/context-awesome/find-awesome-tools.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00195 | $0.01415 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00097 | $0.00707 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
find-awesome-tools scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Find Awesome Tools
Curated discovery of tools, libraries, frameworks, and resources across thousands of community-maintained awesome-lists. Reach for this skill when the user is deciding what to use in a technology space — not when they already have a specific library in hand and need its API or configuration.
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when the user:
- Asks "what are good X for Y" or "recommend X"
- Wants a comparison of options in a category
- Explores an unfamiliar space and needs to see what exists
- Mentions "awesome list", "curated list", or names a broad category
Do not use this skill when the user already knows the library and needs docs, configuration help, or debugging for it — that belongs to a documentation skill.
Workflow
Three tools mirror one concept: find sections, search items, fetch items from a list. Pick the path based on the user's intent.
| User intent | Path |
|---|---|
| "What exists in category X?" | find_awesome_section → get_awesome_items |
| "Find me a keyword or concept" | search_awesome_items (one-shot) |
| "Give me everything from list Y" | get_awesome_items directly (when repo/listId is known) |
MCP callers invoke the tools directly. CLI callers use the matching subcommand: sections, search, items. Both transports hit the same backend.
Tools
find_awesome_section / context-awesome sections
Discovers sections (categories) matching a query across every indexed awesome-list. Call this before get_awesome_items unless you already know the githubRepo or listId.
Inputs:
query(required) — search termsconfidence(optional, default0.3) — minimum match confidence, 0–1limit(optional, default10) — maximum sections returned
MCP:
{ "query": "graph databases", "limit": 5 }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 146 lines · 195 tokens per session scan A 3362e2e0165e
find-awesome-tools is a skill published in the GitHub repository bh-rat/context-awesome (59 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 195 tokens to every session and 1,415 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.
algorithmic-art
Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright…
skill-creator
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Assistant's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
symbolpeek
Token-efficient code, JSON, and Markdown navigation; use before whole-file reads.
copy-editing
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' or 'sharpen the…