Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bhuvangupta/vapt-claude --skill vapt-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bhuvangupta/vapt-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhuvangupta/vapt-claude/vapt-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhuvangupta/vapt-claude/vapt-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bhuvangupta/vapt-claude/vapt-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhuvangupta/vapt-claude/vapt-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bhuvangupta/vapt-claude/vapt-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01377 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00688 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
vapt-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Markdown Report Generation
When Invoked
The user runs /vapt report <url>.
Behavior
Scan the current directory for all VAPT output files and compile them into a comprehensive, client-ready Markdown report.
Phase 1: Data Collection
1.1 Scan for Output Files
Check for the existence of each output file:
VAPT-RECON.md, VAPT-NETWORK.md, VAPT-SSL.md, VAPT-SCAN.md,
VAPT-INJECT.md, VAPT-AUTH.md, VAPT-AUTHZ.md, VAPT-API.md,
VAPT-GRAPHQL.md, VAPT-WEBSOCKET.md, VAPT-CLOUD.md,
VAPT-HEADERS.md, VAPT-LOGIC.md, VAPT-AUDIT.md,
VAPT-WAVE1-CONTEXT.md, VAPT-WAVE2-CONTEXT.md, VAPT-WAVE3-FINDINGS.md,
AUTHORIZATION-LOG.md
1.2 Parse Findings
From each file, extract:
- All findings with severity, CVSS, CWE
- Steps to reproduce
- Evidence (request/response)
- Remediation recommendations
1.3 Handle Partial Data
If some files are missing:
- Note which categories were not tested
- Calculate partial Security Posture Score (only for tested categories)
- Include "Scope and Limitations" section listing untested areas
Phase 2: Score Calculation
2.1 Per-Category Scores
For each testing category with data, calculate:
category_score = 100 - sum(severity_penalties)
Critical: -40, High: -25, Medium: -15, Low: -5, Info: -0
Floor: 0
2.2 Overall Security Posture Score
overall = sum(category_score * weight) for tested categories
Normalize if not all categories were tested.
Phase 3: Report Assembly
VAPT-REPORT.md Structure
# Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Test Report
## Document Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Target | <url> |
| Date | <timestamp> |
| Tester | <from AUTHORIZATION-LOG.md> |
| Authorization | <from AUTHORIZATION-LOG.md> |
| Scope | <tested scope> |
| Mode | Pro / Dev |
---
## Executive Summary
<2-3 paragraph non-technical summary for stakeholders>
<Overall security posture rating>
<Key risk areas>
<Top priority actions>
---
## Security Posture Score: XX/100 (Rating)
### Category Breakdown
| Category | Weight | Score | Findings |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|
| Injection | 20% | XX/100 | X critical, X high, X medium |
| Authentication | 15% | XX/100 | ... |
| Authorization | 12% | XX/100 | ... |
| API Security | 12% | XX/100 | ... |
| SSL/TLS | 10% | XX/100 | ... |
| Security Headers | 8% | XX/100 | ... |
| Network Exposure | 8% | XX/100 | ... |
| Web App Surface | 7% | XX/100 | ... |
| Business Logic | 5% | XX/100 | ... |
| Recon Exposure | 3% | XX/100 | ... |
---
## Findings Summary
| # | Title | Severity | CVSS | CWE | Category |
|---|-------|----------|------|-----|----------|
| 1 | ... | Critical | 9.8 | CWE-89 | Injection |
| 2 | ... | High | 7.5 | CWE-639 | Authorization |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Total: X Critical, X High, X Medium, X Low, X Info
---
## Detailed Findings
### FINDING-001: <Title>
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Severity | Critical (CVSS 9.8) |
| CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| CWE | CWE-89 -- SQL Injection |
| OWASP | A03:2021 -- Injection |
| Affected URL | <url/path> |
| Parameter | <param name> |
**Description:**
<what the vulnerability is>
**Steps to Reproduce:**
1. <step 1>
2. <step 2>
3. <step 3>
**Evidence:**
<request/response or screenshot reference>
**Impact:**
<what an attacker can achieve>
**Remediation:**
<specific fix guidance with code examples in dev mode>
---
(Repeat for each finding, sorted by severity: Critical -> Info)
---
## Methodology
### Testing Approach
<brief description of methodology used>
### Waves Executed
| Wave | Phase | Status |
|------|-------|--------|
| Wave 1 | Reconnaissance | Completed / Skipped |
| Wave 2 | Scanning | Completed / Skipped |
| Wave 3 | Testing | Completed / Skipped |
### Tools Used
<list of tools used with versions>
---
## Scope and Limitations
### In Scope
<domains, paths, functionality tested>
### Out of Scope
<what was not tested and why>
### Skipped Tests
<tests skipped due to missing tools or --skip flag>
---
## Remediation Priority Matrix
### Immediate (Critical + High, < 1 week)
1. <finding with specific fix>
2. <finding with specific fix>
### Short-term (Medium, < 1 month)
1. <finding with specific fix>
### Long-term (Low + Info, ongoing)
1. <finding with improvement suggestion>
---
## Appendix
### A. Raw Tool Outputs
<condensed tool outputs for reference>
### B. CVSS Scoring Reference
<brief CVSS v3.1 explanation>
### C. Glossary
<terms used in this report>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 225 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 76a44b741ecb
vapt-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository bhuvangupta/vapt-claude (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,377 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
competitive-intel
Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".
influencer-discovery
Find and rank influencers by niche, engagement, and authenticity using Xpoz. Searches Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit for active voices in any topic. Use when asked to "find influencers", "discover thought leaders", "who's talking about X", "influencer research", or "find KOLs".
reddit-research
Search and analyze Reddit discussions for market research, product feedback, and community insights using Xpoz. Use when asked to "search Reddit", "what does Reddit think about X", "Reddit feedback on X", "subreddit analysis", or "Reddit market research".
security-osint
Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".
social-sentiment-analyzer
Analyze brand or topic sentiment across Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram using Xpoz. Classifies posts as positive/neutral/negative, extracts recurring themes, and generates a sentiment report. Use when asked for "sentiment analysis", "what are people saying about X", "brand sentiment", or "social media opinion on X".
pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature idea taken end-to-end in one autonomous run — phrases like "run the whole pipeline", "take this feature from idea to finished branch", "brainstorm then build it autonomously", "do everything from idea to merged", "implement all phases without stopping". Triggers when they want…