Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bierlingm/spikes/worker-widgetnpx skills add bierlingm/spikes --skill worker-widgetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bierlingm/spikesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bierlingm/spikes/worker-widget)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bierlingm/spikes/worker-widget"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bierlingm/spikes/worker-widget.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
worker-widget scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Widget Worker
NOTE: Startup and cleanup are handled by worker-base. This skill defines the WORK PROCEDURE.
When to Use This Skill
Features that modify widget behavior (widget/spikes.js), widget config parsing, POST/sync logic, visual indicators, or require syncing the 4 widget copies. Also handles widget-related documentation updates.
Required Skills
agent-browser— for manual verification of widget behavior in the browser. Invoke after implementation to verify interactive behaviors (button appearance, error indicators, tooltips, POST targets).
Work Procedure
-
Read the feature description thoroughly. Understand the behavioral change and acceptance criteria.
-
Read the architecture notes:
.factory/library/architecture.md— especially "Widget Endpoint Resolution" and "Widget Error Visibility" sections- Current widget source:
widget/spikes.js(source of truth)
-
Write tests first (if applicable).
- This widget has no JS test harness. Instead, plan your manual verification steps BEFORE coding.
- List the specific scenarios you will verify with agent-browser.
-
Implement the change in
widget/spikes.js.widget/spikes.jsis the SOURCE OF TRUTH. Edit this file first.- Follow existing patterns: inline styles, no external dependencies, IIFE pattern.
- For config changes: modify the
configobject initialization (~line 30-35). - For POST changes: modify
saveSpike()(~line 260-295). - For button changes: modify
createButton()and related functions.
-
Sync all 4 widget copies. After editing
widget/spikes.js, copy it to:site/spikes.jssite/widget.jscli/assets/spikes.jsVerify with:diff widget/spikes.js site/spikes.js && diff widget/spikes.js site/widget.js && diff widget/spikes.js cli/assets/spikes.js
-
Run automated tests:
cd cli && cargo test --jobs 5— all tests must passgzip -c widget/spikes.js | wc -c— must be ≤15,360 bytes (15KB)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 95 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 80ef59f10f5c
worker-widget is a skill published in the GitHub repository bierlingm/spikes (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…