choose-agent-architecture

choose-agent-architecture is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from bikeread/promethos. It costs 29 tokens per session (658 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for choosing how to divide work between one or more software agents. It considers the job, tools, planning difficulty, memory needs, and approval boundaries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when deciding whether a task needs one agent or several, or when an existing agent has poorly defined responsibilities.
Why use it?
It helps avoid adding extra agents when one is enough and exposes unclear requirements before architecture decisions are made.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when deciding whether a task needs one agent or several, or when an existing agent has poorly defined responsibilities.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add bikeread/promethos --skill choose-agent-architecture
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bikeread/promethos

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for choose-agent-architecture

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for choose-agent-architecture

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bikeread/promethos/choose-agent-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 658 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.00658
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00329
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00132
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00066

Measured 10d ago against content hash c31eab54b563, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

choose-agent-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/choose-agent-architecture/SKILL.md · 81 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Goal

Choose a clear agent architecture that fits the requirements without adding unnecessary complexity.

Inputs

  • Approved requirements brief
  • Available tools and runtime constraints
  • Existing implementation, if any

Non-Goals

  • Producing a full implementation plan
  • Defaulting to multi-agent patterns for status or novelty

Workflow

Trigger signals

  • Requirements are pinned down but no architecture exists yet
  • User asks "要几个 agent" or "should this be one agent or many"
  • Tools and memory needs are listed but not assigned to components
  • An existing agent is being refactored because its boundaries are wrong

1. Restate the architectural pressure

Summarize the requirement forces that actually matter: tool use, planning complexity, long-running work, memory needs, approval boundaries, or delegation. If the job, beneficiary, or success bar is still unclear, stop and send the work back to define-agent-requirements instead of smuggling requirement work into the architecture step. Success criteria: The architecture discussion is anchored in explicit design pressure instead of generic agent buzzwords.

2. Map the smallest viable responsibility slices

Identify the minimum set of responsibilities the system must carry well, such as planning, execution, memory access, verification, or orchestration. Success criteria: The problem is decomposed into a small number of non-overlapping responsibilities.

3. Compare 2-3 viable shapes

Evaluate candidate shapes such as a single tool-using agent, a layered agent with helper modules, or a delegated multi-agent design. Reject options that add complexity without solving a real pressure. Success criteria: There is a recommended shape and explicit reasons the alternatives were not selected.

4. Define boundaries and interfaces

Describe the major components, what each component owns, and what information or artifacts move across boundaries. Success criteria: A future implementation plan can name concrete files or modules without inventing new responsibilities.

Read the full file on GitHub · 81 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 81 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A c31eab54b563

Subscribe to this mod's changes

choose-agent-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository bikeread/promethos (33 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 658 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens