Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team --skill deck-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/deck-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/deck-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/deck-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/deck-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/deck-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00444 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
deck-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Deck Quality Review
Use this skill to evaluate a generated PPT and decide whether it can be delivered.
Review Dimensions
Goal fit
Audience fit
Content accuracy
Source traceability
Storyline clarity
Slide-level readability
Visual consistency
Template fidelity when a template is provided
Media completeness for images and videos
Editable PPTX integrity
Boss requirement coverage
Scoring
目标匹配：0-10
内容准确性：0-10
结构清晰度：0-10
页面可读性：0-10
视觉一致性：0-10
模板遵从性：0-10
媒体完整性：0-10
来源追踪：0-10
可编辑性：0-10
综合分：0-10
P0 Failures
No final_deck.pptx.
Deck is mostly page screenshots.
Important claims have no source.
Boss-required section missing.
Template content copied into final deck.
Template provided but final deck ignores template layout, fonts, backgrounds, header/footer or page rhythm.
Required image/video assets remain placeholders or manual insertion instructions.
Slides unreadable or overflowing.
PPTX cannot be opened.
Template Fidelity Check
When a template is provided, verify:
template/template_fidelity_plan.md exists
style_spec.json includes template_pptx and template_fidelity
slides map to template page types or documented exceptions
fonts, backgrounds, margins, page furniture and component style remain consistent
new layouts stay inside the template system
unrelated template business content was not copied
Media Check
Verify:
images use local image_path/processed_path
videos use video_path or video_url
video links have thumbnails or readable link cards when embedding is unsupported
external media has source and rights-risk metadata
media supports the slide message rather than filling space
Output Format
Summary
Scores
P0 issues
P1 issues
Slide-by-slide findings
Editable PPTX check
Template fidelity check
Media asset check
Revision instructions
Decision: pass / revise
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 89 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0e8c56c9d470
deck-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (106 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 444 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pdf-processor
Extracts text and tables from PDF files, fills forms, and merges documents. Use when working with PDF files or when the user mentions PDFs, forms, or document extraction.
docx
Instructions for safely reading, creating, and editing Microsoft Word documents and templates, including tables, images, comments, and tracked changes.
A guide for working with PDF files, including reading, extracting content, creating, editing, and checking documents.
pptx
Instructions for reading, creating, and editing PowerPoint presentation files and templates, including .pptx, .potx, and older .ppt files. They cover text, tables, images, charts, layouts, and speaker notes.
xlsx
Instructions for reading, creating, editing, cleaning, and converting spreadsheet files such as XLSX, XLSM, XLS, CSV, and TSV. It covers formulas, formatting, charts, macros, and data types.
generate-readme
Generate or refresh a comprehensive, professional README.md for a repository, with architecture overview, mermaid and optional C4 diagrams, repository structure, dependencies, and API documentation. Use whenever the user asks to create, write, update, improve, or regenerate a README, project documentation, or a…