research-ideation-screening

research-ideation-screening is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team. It costs 28 tokens per session (423 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research workflow for creating, testing, ranking, and selecting ideas based on gaps in published work and practical experiment limits. It records each idea with evidence, a testable hypothesis, an implementation plan, and risks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to generate machine-learning research ideas, compare them in a screening matrix, define baselines and evaluation measures, estimate resources, and decide when to stop an idea.
Why use it?
It reduces vague claims that an idea is new by connecting each proposal to evidence and an experiment that could prove it wrong.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to generate machine-learning research ideas, compare them in a screening matrix, define baselines and evaluation measures, estimate resources, and decide when to stop an idea.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team --skill research-ideation-screening
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for research-ideation-screening

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for research-ideation-screening

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/research-ideation-screening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 423 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.00423
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00211
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00085
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00042

Measured 10d ago against content hash ec7bd6dcef19, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research-ideation-screening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

teams/auto_research_team/skills/research-ideation-screening/SKILL.md · 105 lines

What it actually says

Research Ideation Screening

This skill prevents vague novelty claims. An idea is only useful if it is tied to evidence, implementable under constraints, and falsifiable by an experiment.


1. Idea Generation Lenses

Generate candidates using at least five lenses:

failure case repair
metric-target mismatch
data efficiency
compute efficiency
robustness and distribution shift
architecture simplification
training objective change
evaluation protocol improvement
tooling or reproducibility gap
negative result worth documenting

Avoid ideas that only rename existing methods.


2. Idea Card

Write each candidate in:

research_workspace/ideas/idea_<N>.md

Template:

# Idea <N>: <title>

- Gap:
- Evidence:
- Hypothesis:
- Method sketch:
- Minimal implementation:
- Baseline:
- Dataset/benchmark:
- Primary metric:
- Ablation:
- Expected failure mode:
- Resource estimate:
- Novelty risk:
- License/data risk:
- Stop condition:

3. Screening Matrix

Maintain:

research_workspace/ideas/screening_matrix.md

Score 1-5:

evidence strength
novelty
implementation simplicity
evaluation clarity
resource fit
expected impact
risk containment
paper-worthiness

Select the idea with the best combination of evidence, feasibility, and falsifiability, not the most impressive wording.


4. Red-Team Questions

Before committing to an idea, answer:

Has this already been done?
Can a small experiment disprove it?
Is the baseline fair?
Would a null result still teach something?
Can the implementation be isolated?
Can results be plotted in one clear table or figure?
What would make us abandon the idea?

If these cannot be answered, return to literature mapping or scope refinement.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 105 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A ec7bd6dcef19

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-ideation-screening is a skill published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (106 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 423 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories