revision-compliance-gate

revision-compliance-gate is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team. It costs 30 tokens per session (500 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review checklist for checking whether a revised fiction draft truly addressed earlier critic and reader feedback. It compares the old problems with evidence in the new draft.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create a pass, partial, or fail report for each issue, confirm changes in the text, and decide whether to send the draft back for revision or re-review.
Why use it?
It prevents superficial revisions that only polish wording while leaving major story problems unresolved. It also shows whether the draft is ready for another review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to create a pass, partial, or fail report for each issue, confirm changes in the text, and decide whether to send the draft back for revision or re-review.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team --skill revision-compliance-gate
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for revision-compliance-gate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for revision-compliance-gate

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/revision-compliance-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 500 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.00500
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00250
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00100
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00050

Measured 9d ago against content hash 11893358ad4a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

revision-compliance-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

teams/story_team/skills/revision-compliance-gate/SKILL.md · 72 lines

What it actually says

Revision Compliance Gate / 返修遵从度门禁

本门禁不评价“文笔是否变好”,只判断:返修是否真实执行了上一轮 P0/P1。


1. 输入

reviews/critic_vNN.md
reviews/reader_impact_vNN.md
revisions/revision_routing_vNN_to_vNN+1.md
revisions/revision_plan_vNN_to_vNN+1.md
revisions/change_log_vNN_to_vNN+1.md
drafts/draft_vNN.md
drafts/draft_vNN+1.md

2. 验收表格式

# Revision Compliance Report: draft_vNN+1

## Verdict
pass / partial / fail

| issue_id | 层级 | 上轮问题 | 要求改动 | 声称改动 | 文本证据 | 是否解决 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

3. 判定规则

fail:任一 P0 未定位回应,或声称重写但文本只做表面润色。
partial:P0 已处理但 P1 大量未处理,或产生新的明显结构/人物问题。
pass:所有 P0 有真实文本改动,核心 P1 有对应处理,change_log 可追踪。

以下情况直接 fail:

没有 routing table。
没有 change_log。
change_log 只写“已优化/已润色/已增强”。
需要更新事实源但未更新 story bible/scene outline。
需要重写段落但只改了形容词和句子顺序。
复评前没有生成完整新稿。

4. 输出后动作

pass:允许 critic_agent 和 reader_impact_agent 复评。
partial:允许复评但必须标记残留问题,iteration_controller 默认 continue。
fail:不得进入复评,退回对应责任 agent 重新返修。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 72 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 11893358ad4a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

revision-compliance-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (106 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories