Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bish-x/bx-dev-skill --skill legal-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bish-x/bx-dev-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bish-x/bx-dev-skill/legal-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bish-x/bx-dev-skill/legal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bish-x/bx-dev-skill/legal-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bish-x/bx-dev-skill/legal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bish-x/bx-dev-skill/legal-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.03477 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01739 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00695 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00348 |
Grade A, and why
legal-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 432 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 8701065ff5cd
legal-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bish-x/bx-dev-skill (23 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 3,477 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-compliance
Guides security professionals in implementing defense-in-depth security architectures, achieving compliance with industry frameworks (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, HIPAA), conducting threat modeling and risk assessments, managing security operations and incident response, and embedding security throughout the SDLC.
ag-sentinel
Maquina autonoma de seguranca, load testing e LGPD. 6 dimensoes, modo hybrid, convergencia SSS >= 80. Security Certificate + Load Report + Fix PR.
ag-8-seguranca
Maquina autonoma de seguranca (wrapper SENTINEL). Security + load testing + LGPD compliance. 6 dimensoes, modo hybrid, convergencia SSS >= 80. Security Certificate.
compliance-audit
Audits codebases against compliance frameworks (SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, ISO27001, etc.) using parallel agents per subdirectory/sub-repo. Produces a detailed markdown report with line-level code references. Use when you need to check a directory or monorepo for compliance violations before an audit or review.
stripe-dispute
Fight Stripe disputes and chargebacks by gathering evidence (Stripe API + your app database + terms page), generating an activity-log PDF, and submitting a counter-dispute. Use when the user says "fight dispute", "stripe dispute", "chargeback", "counter dispute", "dispute evidence", or shares a Stripe dispute ID.
legal-discovery
Audit e-discovery and litigation document review systems -- data collection pipelines (PST, MBOX, SharePoint, Slack), document processing (OCR via Tesseract/ABBYY, metadata extraction, deduplication), Technology Assisted Review (TAR 1.0/2.0/CAL with recall/precision tracking).