Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bitflight-devops/skilllint --skill rebasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.00900 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
rebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to rebase — 205 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rebase
Mandatory Pre-Rebase Analysis
Complete all steps below before running git rebase.
Step 1 — Identify the merge base and branch files
MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base <branch> <target>)
git diff <target>...<branch> --name-only # files touched by the branch
git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<target>" --name-only # files changed on target since divergence
Step 2 — Diff overlapping files
For each file appearing in both lists above, read both sides:
git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<target>" -- <file> # what target changed
git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<branch>" -- <file> # what the branch changed
Determine what each side changed and in which regions.
Step 3 — Assign a disposition to every overlapping file
| Disposition | When to use |
|---|---|
| KEEP | Branch version wins; target change is irrelevant or already superseded |
| MERGE | Both sides changed different regions — list which regions each side owns |
| DROP | Branch change superseded by what target already landed; discard it |
| REWRITE | Branch intent survives, but implementation must change to account for target's changes |
| NO_CONFLICT | File touched only by the branch — no overlap with target |
Step 4 — State the plan before executing
Output the full plan in this format before any git rebase command:
Pre-rebase plan — <branch> onto <target>
Overlapping files:
path/to/file.py: MERGE — branch adds X in foo(); target rewrites bar(); no region overlap
path/to/other.py: DROP — target already landed the same change
path/to/third.py: REWRITE — branch intent survives; must account for renamed parameter on target
No-conflict files (branch-only): path/a.py, path/b.py
Step 5 — Execute the rebase
git rebase <target> <branch>
Pass <branch> — the same one Steps 1-4 analysed. git rebase's positional form is
[<upstream> [<branch>]]; omitting <branch> rebases whatever is currently checked out, which
is a different branch whenever the analysis targeted one you are not standing on. That rewrites
commits the plan never looked at and leaves the requested branch untouched.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 6f68c7633650
rebase is a skill published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (7 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 900 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to rebase, differing in 205 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
prowler-commit
Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.
gh-auth-isolation
Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.
github-skill
Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.
comet-github
A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.
release-helper
Ensures configuration and code changes are released correctly. Use PROACTIVELY whenever you edit config.json, change any setting, or fix a configuration bug in this project, so the change reaches production.