rebase

A guided Git rebase procedure. Rebasing reapplies one branch's changes on top of another branch, such as main.

In plain words
What is it for?
For safely rebasing a branch after reviewing which changes to keep, combine, remove, or rewrite.
Why use it?
It compares both branches before changing Git history and assigns a decision to every overlapping file, reducing surprise conflicts and lost work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bitflight-devops/skilllint/rebase
Any agent
npx skills add bitflight-devops/skilllint --skill rebase
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllint

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 900 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00114 $0.00900
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.00450
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00180
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00090

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6f68c7633650, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to rebase — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/rebase/SKILL.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Rebase

Mandatory Pre-Rebase Analysis

Complete all steps below before running git rebase.

Step 1 — Identify the merge base and branch files

MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base <branch> <target>)
git diff <target>...<branch> --name-only        # files touched by the branch
git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<target>" --name-only  # files changed on target since divergence

Step 2 — Diff overlapping files

For each file appearing in both lists above, read both sides:

git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<target>" -- <file>    # what target changed
git diff "${MERGE_BASE}..<branch>" -- <file>    # what the branch changed

Determine what each side changed and in which regions.

Step 3 — Assign a disposition to every overlapping file

Disposition When to use
KEEP Branch version wins; target change is irrelevant or already superseded
MERGE Both sides changed different regions — list which regions each side owns
DROP Branch change superseded by what target already landed; discard it
REWRITE Branch intent survives, but implementation must change to account for target's changes
NO_CONFLICT File touched only by the branch — no overlap with target

Step 4 — State the plan before executing

Output the full plan in this format before any git rebase command:

Pre-rebase plan — <branch> onto <target>

Overlapping files:
  path/to/file.py: MERGE — branch adds X in foo(); target rewrites bar(); no region overlap
  path/to/other.py: DROP — target already landed the same change
  path/to/third.py: REWRITE — branch intent survives; must account for renamed parameter on target

No-conflict files (branch-only): path/a.py, path/b.py

Step 5 — Execute the rebase

git rebase <target> <branch>

Pass <branch> — the same one Steps 1-4 analysed. git rebase's positional form is [<upstream> [<branch>]]; omitting <branch> rebases whatever is currently checked out, which is a different branch whenever the analysis targeted one you are not standing on. That rewrites commits the plan never looked at and leaves the requested branch untouched.

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 91 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 6f68c7633650

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rebase is a skill published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 900 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to rebase, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens