review-fix-address-bots

review-fix-address-bots is a skill for Codex from biw/skills. It costs 40 tokens per session (3,226 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided workflow for reviewing a code change, fixing accepted findings, and checking the result with the repository's own commands. Reviewers and review bots provide feedback, while the main agent controls edits and Git or pull-request changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to integrate a pull request's base, run read-only reviewers, decide which findings to fix, validate the fixes, respond to review bots, and compare review quality.
Why use it?
It organizes the cycle of review, correction, and re-review while protecting the working tree from unwanted changes. It also helps address automated review comments consistently.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to integrate a pull request's base, run read-only reviewers, decide which findings to fix, validate the fixes, respond to review bots, and compare review quality.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots
View source ↗ biw/skills
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add biw/skills --skill review-fix-address-bots
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/biw/skills

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-fix-address-bots

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-fix-address-bots

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biw/skills/review-fix-address-bots.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,226 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket warn 24 Aug 2026
  • Snyk warn 24 Aug 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.03226
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01613
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00645
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00323

Measured 10d ago against content hash fe25987c9126, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-fix-address-bots scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/review-run-log.mjs), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-fix-address-bots/SKILL.md · 129 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review, Fix, and Address Bots

Execute these phases in order. The primary agent alone owns judgment, edits, commands that mutate the workspace, validation, Git, PR changes, and bot replies.

Invariants

  • Reviewers are advisory and strictly read-only. They may inspect files, diffs, history, tests, and existing output, but must not modify files or Git/PR state; run tests, builds, package scripts, generators, or arbitrary repository commands; or delegate implementation.
  • Include this boundary in every reviewer prompt: “Operate in read-only mode. You are advisory only. Never modify the workspace or Git/PR state, and never commit or push. Return findings and critique to the primary agent, who makes the final decision.”
  • Preserve unrelated user changes. Never use reset, automatic stashing, broad staging, history rewriting, or checkpoint commits to clear a dirty tree.
  • Logging is observational. If it fails, report the failure and continue the safe workflow; never change code, judgment, Git/PR state, or loop limits for telemetry.
  • Treat scripts/review-run-log.mjs as an opaque executable. Never read its source during this workflow. Invoke its documented commands and use templates, --help, and the Markdown references; inspect or change its source only when the user explicitly asks to debug or modify the helper.

1. Prepare the integrated target

  1. Read repository instructions and applicable implementation skills. Record branch, status, target, remotes, upstream, PR state, and the initial dirty-state ownership boundary. Require a named non-target branch before pushing; never rename it or push the default branch without explicit authorization.
  2. Use the user's review prompt. If a requested custom prompt is unavailable, stop for it. Only when none was requested, read references/review-guidelines.md.
  3. Resolve this skill's directory and run node <skill-dir>/scripts/review-run-log.mjs templates for canonical payloads, then start with the resolved cohort and limits before review work. Keep its logPath in .context; append material transitions and every reviewer invocation. Read references/run-logging.md only if the helper rejects a record, logging needs extension, or telemetry behavior must be diagnosed.
  4. Inspect committed, staged, unstaged, and relevant untracked changes together. Prefer Conductor's workspace diff; otherwise inspect the merge-base-to-HEAD diff, git diff HEAD, git status --short, and relevant untracked files. Exclude unrelated user work from the implementation.
  5. Resolve the PR's actual base branch and repository remote; without a PR use repository configuration. Fetch that base explicitly, record its ref and SHA, and do not use git pull. If the fetched SHA is not an ancestor of HEAD, integrate it before formal review with an explicit merge by default. Rebase only when required or requested, and never rewrite published history without authorization.
  6. Do not let pre-existing staged changes enter a merge commit. If dirty work makes integration unsafe, stop. Resolve conflicts from both branches' intent, surrounding code, and tests; request input for material product, UX, public API, or architecture choices. The integrated tree, conflict resolutions included, is the review target. If integration happens after review starts, invalidate every report and rerun the cohort.
  7. Before the first push, resolve authority to create a PR if none exists and the bot phase requires one. Stop before the remote mutation when authority is absent.

Read the full file on GitHub · 129 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 129 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A fe25987c9126

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-fix-address-bots is a skill published in the GitHub repository biw/skills (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,226 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

review-implement-phase

Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.

prisma/orm · 38 tokens

engram-branch-pr

PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 37 tokens

verify-behavior

Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…

nicknisi/dotfiles · 68 tokens

github-contributor

End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…

daymade/claude-code-skills · 133 tokens

revdiff

Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…

umputun/revdiff · 248 tokens

write-pr

Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.

tldraw/tldraw · 53 tokens