Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BjornMelin/dev-skills --skill design-motion-systemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BjornMelin/dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/design-motion-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/design-motion-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/design-motion-system/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/design-motion-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/design-motion-system.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.01526 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00763 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00305 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
design-motion-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 426 B
- archive.json 950 B
- evals/evals.json 4.8 KB
- evals/trigger-queries.json 2.7 KB
- references/design-system-tokens.md 3.8 KB
- references/motion-vocabulary.md 7.2 KB
- references/provenance.json 1.3 KB
- references/routing-workflows.md 2.0 KB
- scripts/audit_motion_system.py 5.5 KB runs code
- scripts/detect_motion_stack.py 5.1 KB runs code
- scripts/scaffold_motion_tokens.py 4.4 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_motion_scripts.py 8.8 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 122 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 86a6c519a4db
design-motion-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository BjornMelin/dev-skills (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 1,526 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-accessibility
A Chinese-language assistant for diagnosing accessibility and ease-of-use problems in a page or service. Accessibility means making digital products usable by people with different abilities and needs.
ai-baoyu-image-cards
A visual content assistant for creating image cards, which are graphics that present information in a readable format. It can assess a card concept, suggest prompts or storyboards, and check publishing specifications.
ai-design-brief
A design-brief assistant that checks whether a design request is clear enough to work from. A design brief describes the goal, audience, requirements, and expected result of a design task.
ai-design-taste-frontend
A frontend visual-quality reviewer that examines whether an interface looks polished and coherent. It produces visual or creative diagnoses, prompt or storyboard ideas, and publishing checks.
ai-extract-design-system
A visual-quality review assistant for examining a product or software interface and its design patterns.
ai-frontend-design
A visual-quality review assistant for checking whether a design is ready to publish.