Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BjornMelin/dev-skills --skill native-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BjornMelin/dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/native-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/native-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/native-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/native-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bjornmelin/dev-skills/native-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01137 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00455 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
native-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
23 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 368 B
- archive.json 701 B
- assets/examples/native-validation-starter.md 191 B
- assets/templates/native-validation-audit-report.md 652 B
- assets/templates/native-validation-review-checklist.md 1.3 KB
- evals/evals.json 4.2 KB
- evals/trigger-queries.json 4.3 KB
- references/animation-test-harnesses.md 2.5 KB
- references/docs-eas-build.md 1.4 KB
- references/docs-expo-development-builds.md 1.4 KB
- references/docs-expo-doctor.md 2.0 KB
- references/docs-expo-new-architecture.md 1.5 KB
- references/docs-reanimated-jest-and-worklets.md 1.6 KB
- references/docs-rn-testing-overview.md 1.5 KB
- references/expo-doctor-eas-gates.md 1.6 KB
- references/index.md 755 B
- references/motion-package-compatibility.md 1.5 KB
- references/provenance.json 2.1 KB
- references/risk-tier-validation-ladder.md 2.5 KB
- references/source-ledger.md 1.7 KB
- references/test-and-device-matrix.md 1.5 KB
- references/validation-playbook.md 5.2 KB
- scripts/audit.mjs 42 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 5ac08cc62cf4
native-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository BjornMelin/dev-skills (8 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,137 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
argent-test-ui-flow
Autonomously test an app UI (iOS or Android) by running interact-screenshot-verify loops using argent MCP tools. Use when testing UI flows, verifying login works, testing navigation, running end-to-end UI test scenarios, manual QA steps, visible UI changes, or visual behavior.
argent-create-flow
Create, record, edit, replay, or repair reusable Argent flow YAML files. Use when the user asks to record or replay a repeatable device path, set up profiling or an A/B comparison, or invoke the authoring engine behind argent-qa-flows. Also use before repeating three or more interactions. For one-off UI checks…
argent-ios-device-interact
Drive a physical iPhone through argent. Use when a physical iPhone is involved (a list-devices iOS entry with kind "device") and ONLY then; never for a simulator. For cable, trust, or signing problems read argent-ios-device-setup.
argent-ios-device-setup
Set up a cabled physical iPhone for argent. Use when a physical iPhone is involved (a list-devices iOS entry with kind "device") and ONLY then; never for a simulator.
accessibility-testing
WCAG compliance testing and accessibility quality assurance workflows for iOS apps. Use when validating accessibility labels, testing VoiceOver compatibility, checking contrast ratios, or ensuring WCAG 2.1 compliance. Covers accessibility tree analysis, semantic validation, and automated accessibility testing patterns.
ios-testing-patterns
XCTest and XCUITest execution workflows and flaky test detection patterns.