Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bkircher/skills --skill git-commit-messagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bkircher/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bkircher/skills/git-commit-message)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bkircher/skills/git-commit-message"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bkircher/skills/git-commit-message/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bkircher/skills/git-commit-message"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bkircher/skills/git-commit-message.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit-message scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a commit message for the staged changes. If changes are staged, return only the commit message, with no code fence or commentary. Otherwise, report that nothing is staged.
Inspect the staged changes
List the staged files:
If this produces no output, report that nothing is staged and do not invent a message. Otherwise, read the complete staged diff:
Use the conversation context to understand the rationale, but describe only the staged diff. Ignore unstaged and untracked changes.
Inspect the repository style
Read recent non-merge commit subjects before drafting the message:
Match the established style. Use Conventional Commit syntax such as
feat(scope): ... or fix(scope): ... only when it clearly dominates recent
history. Isolated examples and component prefixes such as subdir: ... do not
establish that convention.
Use concise, natural language
- Prefer plain, slightly informal engineering language over formal wording.
- When unambiguous, prefer
infra,config,prod, anddevoverinfrastructure,configuration,production, anddevelopment. - Preserve exact names from the staged diff and follow established repository terminology when it differs.
Write the subject
- Limit the subject to 50 characters.
- Use the imperative mood:
fix, notfixedorfixes. - Do not end the subject with a period.
- When changes affect one clear component and history uses component prefixes,
use
<component>: <imperative summary>and match the casing used in recent history. Otherwise, capitalize the first word of an unprefixed subject.
Write the body
Use this format unless the subject fully describes one small, self-explanatory change:
<subject>
Changes:
- <change or rationale>
- <change or rationale>
- Separate the body from the subject with a blank line.
- Keep every body line within 72 characters, including indentation.
- Explain what changed and why without repeating the subject or including unnecessary implementation details.
- Use only as many bullets as needed; do not invent items to reach a fixed count.
- Do not end a one-line bullet with a period.
- Wrap bullets at word boundaries and indent continuation lines by two spaces.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago Changed · -2 tokens per session ea686b5b4683
- 2mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 29df2af934f6
git-commit-message is a skill published in the GitHub repository bkircher/skills (11 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…