Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bks-lab/open-bridge --skill bridge-onboardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bks-lab/open-bridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bks-lab/open-bridge/bridge-onboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bks-lab/open-bridge/bridge-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bks-lab/open-bridge/bridge-onboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bks-lab/open-bridge/bridge-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bks-lab/open-bridge/bridge-onboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.02488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00498 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
bridge-onboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bridge Onboard — Setup Wizard
Set up a new Bridge user or reconfigure an existing one. Read the referenced file ONLY when triggered.
Philosophy — Discover, don't Interrogate
A new user came here to configure an assistant, not to inventory their life. Asking abstract questions like "do you file taxes for multiple legal entities?" or "do you have a household mandant?" makes the user defensive — they don't know yet what those features do, so they say "skip" to everything and miss the point.
Instead, the wizard:
- Looks at what's already on the system (with permission)
- Proposes specific features that match the evidence
- Shows the rest as a read-only catalogue with "when you need it"
- Surfaces features proactively later (
feature-discoverystanding-order) when patterns suggest they'd help
All of this is consent-first: before step 1, the user picks
discovery.mode — confined (default) or broader. Confined means
the Bridge never scans the machine (other repos, installed apps, devices,
files, and mail stay untouched) — you still get every feature, just
enabled modularly when you want it via the Phase E catalog, --add <feature>, or the feature's enabled: flag in bridge-config.yaml.
Only broader unlocks the permission-gated scan in step 1.
The entry point is the four-lane front door in
rules/session-start.md § NEW USER front door — it
reflects what Phase 0 detected (origin state, git name), notes the guard is already
armed, and opens four discoverable lanes under a free-text invite: [1] show me around
(demo) · [2] describe what I'll use it for (→ this wizard, purpose pre-filled) · [3]
make it private first (protection) · [4] bind a workspace / org overlay. This file and
references/ are where lanes [2]/[3]/[4] land; the heavy lifting lives in
references/.
Defaults — what the wizard assumes
- Purpose pins a north-star (ordering, never gating). It is captured at the
front door — the user describes what they're here to do (session-start lane
[2]or a free-text answer) and that sentence becomespurpose.statementverbatim; Phase A does not re-ask.purpose.focusanduser_profileare derived silently from the statement — never posed as a visible six-domain questionnaire. Purpose ORDERS the Phase C suggestions, the Phase E catalogue, and (underbroader) thefeature-discoverystanding-order; it never hides, gates, or removes a feature. Empty purpose = today's flat, general-purpose behaviour. Change anytime via--purpose. - GitHub is optional. Onboarding completes end-to-end without a
GitHub org, without
ghCLI, and without GitHub-projects integration. - Upstreams stay empty (
upstreams: []) by default. Upstream variant choice is a separate, optional step via--upstream. - Work-system on by default. Phase D recommends enabling — it's
what makes Claude resume context across sessions. The wizard
explains the trade-off but suggests
[y]. - Discovery scan is opt-in per source. Default-on sources are non-invasive (git config, dir listings, app list). Sensitive sources (mail accounts, finance-app accounts, calendar names) are default-off and only opt-in.
- Nothing scanned beyond names. Mail content, document content, message bodies, keychain, passwords — NEVER touched. Explicit in the permission prompt so trust is established.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 193 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 59ce088b4c25
bridge-onboard is a skill published in the GitHub repository bks-lab/open-bridge (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,488 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
xlsx
Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify…
Comprehensive PDF manipulation toolkit for extracting text and tables, creating new PDFs, merging/splitting documents, and handling forms. When Claude needs to fill in a PDF form or programmatically process, generate, or analyze PDF documents at scale.
pptx
Presentation creation, editing, and analysis. When Claude needs to work with presentations (.pptx files) for: (1) Creating new presentations, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with layouts, (4) Adding comments or speaker notes, or any other presentation tasks.
docx
Comprehensive document creation, editing, and analysis with support for tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, and text extraction. When Claude needs to work with professional documents (.docx files) for: (1) Creating new documents, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with tracked changes, (4)…
mcp-host-styling-integration
Integrates MCP App UI with host theming system. Applies host CSS variables, handles onhostcontextchanged, safe area insets, display mode detection, and fullscreen configuration.
cog-knowledge-consolidation
Build structured knowledge frameworks from scattered vault notes with source attribution.