Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bl1nk-bot/agent-library --skill speckit-git-validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bl1nk-bot/agent-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bl1nk-bot/agent-library/speckit-git-validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bl1nk-bot/agent-library/speckit-git-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bl1nk-bot/agent-library/speckit-git-validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bl1nk-bot/agent-library/speckit-git-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bl1nk-bot/agent-library/speckit-git-validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00493 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-git-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to speckit-git-validate — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Validate Feature Branch
Validate that the current Git branch follows the expected feature branch naming conventions.
Prerequisites
- Check if Git is available by running
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null - If Git is not available, output a warning and skip validation:
[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch validation
Validation Rules
Get the current branch name:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
The branch name must match one of these patterns:
- Sequential:
^[0-9]{3,}-(e.g.,001-feature-name,042-fix-bug,1000-big-feature) - Timestamp:
^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}-(e.g.,20260319-143022-feature-name)
Execution
If on a feature branch (matches either pattern):
- Output:
✓ On feature branch: <branch-name> - Check if the corresponding spec directory exists under
specs/:- For sequential branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches the numeric portion - For timestamp branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches theYYYYMMDD-HHMMSSportion
- For sequential branches, look for
- If spec directory exists:
✓ Spec directory found: <path> - If spec directory missing:
⚠ No spec directory found for prefix <prefix>
If NOT on a feature branch:
- Output:
✗ Not on a feature branch. Current branch: <branch-name> - Output:
Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name or 20260319-143022-feature-name
Graceful Degradation
If Git is not installed or the directory is not a Git repository:
- Check the
SPECIFY_FEATUREenvironment variable as a fallback - If set, validate that value against the naming patterns
- If not set, skip validation with a warning
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A e18df9149b0d
speckit-git-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository bl1nk-bot/agent-library (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to speckit-git-validate, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-and-publish
Ship a release end-to-end across every registry the project targets (npm, MCP Registry, GitHub Releases for .mcpb bundles, GHCR). Runs the final verification gate, fast-forwards main when the release rode a release PR, creates the annotated tag on the commit main now points at, pushes commits and tags, then publishes…
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
polish-docs-meta
Finalize documentation and project metadata for a ship-ready release. Use after implementation is complete, tests pass, and devcheck is clean. Safe to run at any stage — each step checks current state and only acts on what still needs work.
fluent-brownfield-migration
This skill should be used when the user asks to "convert this app to fluent", "migrate a scoped app to source control", "modernize this servicenow app", "bring an existing app into git", "transform to fluent", or mentions "brownfield" migration of an existing ServiceNow scoped application to the ServiceNow SDK /…
studio-source-control
Drive a scoped application's linked git repository from the instance — what has to be true before Source Control works at all, the commit-then-push order, stashes and branches over /api/snsourcecontrol, and when this replaces update sets rather than sitting next to them.