Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add blackmo18/realm --skill realm-planninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blackmo18/realmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackmo18/realm/realm-planning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackmo18/realm/realm-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackmo18/realm/realm-planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackmo18/realm/realm-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackmo18/realm/realm-planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01867 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00747 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
realm-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
realm-planning
Two-phase planning. P1 = high-level + ADR direction. P2 = code-level impl plan.
Host invocation: Claude Code and Gemini use /realm-planning; Codex uses $realm-planning.
Runs inside native plan mode — each phase has its own Enter/Exit cycle, approval is per-phase, not inherited. Boundary + fallback: references/plan-mode-contract.md.
Anchor-scoped: Phase 1 detects run mode (enhancement / anchored-new / greenfield), resolves seed anchors, caps investigator reads. Phase 2 consumes Phase 1 Anchor Set — no re-scan.
Usage
/realm-planning <topic> # Phase 1
/realm-planning <topic> --phase2 # skip to Phase 2 (plan already approved)
/realm-planning <topic> --lite # Scope & Test shortcut only — Affected Files + Test Scenarios, no ADR, no full plan
When to Use
- Feature not yet implemented
- Architectural direction unclear
- Spans multiple services/files
- Need plan ready for coding agent
- Token-budget constrained, want direction only, will hand-code the implementation yourself, don't need an architecture ADR — use
--lite
Communication Style
Caveman mode active. Drop articles, filler, pleasantries, hedging. Fragments OK. Technical terms exact.
Routing
- Phase 1 → load
phase1/PROCEDURE.md - Phase 2 → load
phase2/PROCEDURE.md - Lite → load
lite/PROCEDURE.md(--liteflag: Scope & Test Definition only, skips architecture + full plan) - Contract → load
contract/PROCEDURE.md(Phase 1 Step 7Contract Deltaembed, or explicitwrite contracttrigger below) write adr→ loadwrite-adr/PROCEDURE.md(trigger below)
"write contract" — Draft API Contract to Vault
Trigger: user says write contract or draft contract — any time after Phase 1 approval, before Phase 2. Does not depend on write adr (that can come later) — but if ## Contract Delta is present, Phase 2 depends on this: phase2/PROCEDURE.md Step 1 refuses to start until the contract file exists. Ordering enforced: Phase 1 → contract (if applicable) → Phase 2.
What ships with it
16 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 269 B
- contract/PROCEDURE.md 5.4 KB
- lite/PROCEDURE.md 4.9 KB
- phase1/PROCEDURE.md 6.5 KB
- phase2/PROCEDURE.md 5.5 KB
- references/anchor-resolution.md 1.2 KB
- references/contract-delta-gate.md 1.3 KB
- references/contract-template.md 2.9 KB
- references/graphify-contract.md 1.7 KB
- references/investigator-rules.md 1.6 KB
- references/layer-rules.md 1.2 KB
- references/logging-plan.md 968 B
- references/plan-mode-contract.md 997 B
- references/plan-template.md 4.2 KB
- references/vault-conventions.md 2.3 KB
- write-adr/PROCEDURE.md 3.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 6ce31517b452
realm-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository blackmo18/realm (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,867 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…