Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp --skill lsp-cross-repogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lspWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-cross-repo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-cross-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-cross-repo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-cross-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-cross-repo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01118 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00559 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
lsp-cross-repo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.
lsp-cross-repo
Multi-root cross-repo caller analysis for library + consumer workflows. Finds all usages of a library symbol across one or more consumer codebases in a single call.
Read-only — does not modify any files.
When to use
- Before changing a library API: find all callers in every consumer
- Before deleting a symbol: verify it has no cross-repo dependents
- When a change in repo A might break repo B or C
- Auditing how internal packages are used across services
Use /lsp-impact instead for single-repo blast-radius analysis.
Workflow
Step 1 — Initialize the primary workspace
Start the language server on the library root if not already running:
mcp__lsp__start_lsp({ "root_dir": "/path/to/library" })
Step 2 — Locate the library symbol
Find the symbol's definition to get file_path, line, and column:
mcp__lsp__find_symbol({ "query": "<symbol-name>" })
Pick the result in the library repo (not a test file).
Step 3 — Find all cross-repo references (primary step)
Call get_cross_repo_references with the symbol location and all consumer repo
roots. This adds each consumer as a workspace folder, waits for indexing, runs
find_references across all roots, and returns results partitioned by repo:
mcp__lsp__get_cross_repo_references({
"symbol_file": "/abs/path/to/library/file.go",
"line": <line>,
"column": <column>,
"consumer_roots": [
"/abs/path/to/consumer-a",
"/abs/path/to/consumer-b"
]
})
Returns:
library_references— usages within the library itselfconsumer_references— a map ofconsumer-root → [file:line ...]warnings— any roots that could not be indexed (check these manually)
Decision after Step 3:
| Result | Action |
|---|---|
| No consumer refs | Safe to change — verify warnings is empty first |
| Consumer refs found | Run /lsp-impact on each call site before editing |
warnings non-empty |
Re-add that root manually and retry Step 3 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 146 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A fec06c4acc1f
lsp-cross-repo is a skill published in the GitHub repository blackwell-systems/agent-lsp (124 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,118 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ide-type-mismatch-fix
Diagnose and fix TypeScript/language type errors using LSP diagnostics, hover, and code actions. For each type error, fetches the expected vs actual types, surfaces quickfix suggestions, and optionally applies them. Use when getDiagnostics shows type errors you want to resolve quickly.
golang-lint
Linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Golang projects — running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and selecting linters. Use when configuring golangci-lint, asking about lint warnings or nolint suppressions, setting up code…
golang-troubleshooting
Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve debugger, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production…
golang-samber-oops
Structured error handling in Golang with samber/oops — error builders, stack traces, error codes, error context, error wrapping, error attributes, user-facing vs developer messages, panic recovery, and logger integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/oops, or when the codebase already imports…
golang-safety
Defensive Golang coding to prevent panics, silent data corruption, and subtle runtime bugs. Use when encountering nil panics, append aliasing, map concurrent access, float comparison pitfalls, or zero-value design questions. Also use when reviewing code for nil-safety, numeric conversion overflow, resource lifecycle…
golang-error-handling
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log…