Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp --skill lsp-test-correlationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lspWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-test-correlation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-test-correlation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-test-correlation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-test-correlation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-test-correlation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01353 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
lsp-test-correlation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- lsp-test-correlation — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.
lsp-test-correlation
Discover which tests cover a source file, then run only those tests. Faster than running the full suite when you've changed one or two files and want targeted feedback.
When to use
- After editing a source file: "Which tests do I need to run for this change?"
- Before committing: run only the tests that cover what you touched
- Debugging a failure: find which test file corresponds to a broken source file
- Code review: understand what test coverage exists for a file before merging
Use /lsp-verify instead when you want to run the full suite and check all
three layers (diagnostics + build + tests). Use this skill when you want fast,
scoped test execution.
Workflow
Step 1 — Find correlated test files
Call get_tests_for_file for each edited source file:
mcp__lsp__get_tests_for_file({ "file_path": "/abs/path/to/source.go" })
Returns the test files that correspond to the source file. For multiple edited files, call once per file.
If no test files are returned: the source file may have no dedicated test file, or the mapping is not resolvable (e.g. integration tests in a separate directory). See Step 2 for fallback.
Step 2 — Enumerate test functions (fallback or enrichment)
If get_tests_for_file returns test files, use find_symbol to list
the test functions defined in those files:
mcp__lsp__find_symbol({ "query": "Test" })
Filter results to the correlated test files from Step 1. This gives you the specific test function names to run rather than the whole test file.
Fallback (no test files found): query find_symbol for test
functions that contain the changed symbol's name:
mcp__lsp__find_symbol({ "query": "Test<ChangedFunctionName>" })
This catches cases where get_tests_for_file misses indirect coverage.
Step 3 — Report the correlation map
Before running, report what was found:
## Test correlation for <file>
Source file: internal/tools/analysis.go
Test files:
→ internal/tools/analysis_test.go
Tests: TestHandleGetCodeActions, TestHandleGetCompletions, TestHandleGetDocumentSymbols
No correlated test files found for: internal/lsp/normalize.go
→ Fallback: TestNormalizeCompletion, TestNormalizeDocumentSymbols (from workspace symbol search)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 180 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A d2a1b7c67ccb
lsp-test-correlation is a skill published in the GitHub repository blackwell-systems/agent-lsp (164 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,353 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
go-127
What changed in Go 1.27 (released August 2026) and how it changes the way Go is written in pi-go. Use this skill when writing or reviewing Go that could use a 1.27 feature, when bumping the go directive in go.mod, when a build or test behaves differently after a toolchain upgrade, or when code-guidelines-go points…
bubbletea-testing
Use this skill whenever writing tests for Bubble Tea (charmbracelet/bubbletea) TUI applications in Go. Triggers include any mention of testing Bubble Tea models, teatest, golden file testing for TUIs, testing tea.Cmd or tea.Msg, snapshot testing terminal output, or writing tests for any Go CLI/TUI that uses the Elm…
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
email-evals
Author and safely run deterministic email-agent evaluation suites with dedicated e2a test agents. Use when a user wants to define synthetic email cases, validate a suite, inspect its dry-run plan, run it after approval, or regrade changed assertions.
check-linters-before-commit
Before any commit, run linters, vet, tests, and build verification; do not commit until checks pass.