Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin/writing-plansnpx skills add Blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Blazity/nextjs-migration-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin/writing-plans.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00690 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00276 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to writing-plans — 37 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: .ai/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
- (User preferences for plan location override this default)
Scope Check
If the spec covers multiple independent subsystems, it should have been broken into sub-project specs during brainstorming. If it wasn't, suggest breaking this into separate plans — one per subsystem. Each plan should produce working, testable software on its own.
File Structure
Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what each one is responsible for. This is where decomposition decisions get locked in.
- Design units with clear boundaries and well-defined interfaces. Each file should have one clear responsibility.
- You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. Prefer smaller, focused files over large ones that do too much.
- Files that change together should live together. Split by responsibility, not by technical layer.
- In existing codebases, follow established patterns. If the codebase uses large files, don't unilaterally restructure - but if a file you're modifying has grown unwieldy, including a split in the plan is reasonable.
This structure informs the task decomposition. Each task should produce self-contained changes that make sense independently.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 153 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 2a1342223323
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository Blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,380 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to writing-plans, differing in 37 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
arcgis-to-portaljs
Migrate a whole ArcGIS Hub site into a PortalJS Arc portal end-to-end. Harvests the Hub /data.json (DCAT-US) inventory, exports every FeatureService layer through the ArcGIS REST query API with resultOffset paging, converts each to the serverless dual tier (PMTiles render + GeoParquet query) with tabular items to…
portaljs-migrate
Migrate (harvest) datasets between open-data platforms. Reads CKAN, a DCAT-US /data.json catalog (DKAN, ArcGIS Hub, data.gov), a DCAT / DCAT-AP RDF feed (JSON-LD, Turtle, or RDF/XML), Socrata, OpenDataSoft, or an ArcGIS FeatureServer, and writes them to a static PortalJS catalog or pushes them into a CKAN instance…
nextjs-upgrade
Next.js version migrations using official guides and codemods. Use when migrating a Next.js project to a new major version using codemods.
next-upgrade
Upgrade Next.js to the latest version following official migration guides and codemods.
migrate-radix-to-base
Migrates React projects and components from Radix UI to Base UI. Use when asked to migrate from radix, move to base-ui, convert radix primitives, or switch a shadcn project's base library. Handles single components ("migrate accordion") and whole projects.
copilotkit-develop
Use when building AI-powered features with CopilotKit v2 -- adding chat interfaces, registering frontend tools, sharing application context with agents, handling agent interrupts, and working with the CopilotKit runtime.